Yahoo Answers: Answers and Comments for Can a Real number be both rational and irrational ? [Mathematics]
Copyright © Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
From Antonia
enUS
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:41:33 +0000
3
Yahoo Answers: Answers and Comments for Can a Real number be both rational and irrational ? [Mathematics]
292
38
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://s.yimg.com/zz/combo?images/emaillogous.png

From Puzzling: No they are mutually exclusive.
A rational nu...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:31:20 +0000
No they are mutually exclusive.
A rational number is one that *can* be represented as the ratio of two integers.
An irrational number is one that *can't* be represented as the ratio of two integers.

From no sea nabo: No
Definition of irrational when it is not ra...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:03:07 +0000
No
Definition of irrational when it is not rational

From Morningfox: No, it can't be both. The defintions do n...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:43:04 +0000
No, it can't be both. The defintions do not overlap. "IR"rational = not rational.

From Anonymous: I think not.
Because of the rules and definitions.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Wed, 21 Aug 2019 04:42:23 +0000
I think not.
Because of the rules and definitions.

From Raymond: No. At least, not in the same base.
A "ra...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:38:56 +0000
No. At least, not in the same base.
A "rational" number is one that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. For example 2/3, 19/7, or even 4 (which is the same as 4/1, 8/2, 12/3, etc.)
If a number CAN be expressed as a rational number (even though it is shown differently), then it is rational.
The number 2.857142857142857142857142..... (forever) is a rational number ( = 20/7)
Any number that CANNOT be expressed as a ratio is "irrational" (meaning, not rational).
If you start mixing bases, then the partition of rational and irrational stops making sense. If you create a situation where a number could be both, then it is neither (it means that the partition of rational vs irrational cannot exist in that situation).

From Blue Ridge: Impossibility. No way!
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:58:07 +0000
Impossibility. No way!

From Krishnamurthy: A number is rational if we can write it as a f...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sun, 18 Aug 2019 07:30:12 +0000
A number is rational if we can write it as a fraction where the top number of the fraction and bottom number are both whole numbers. ... Alternatively, an irrational number is any number that is not rational. It is a number that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers (or cannot be expressed as a fraction).

From Michael: Nothey're two different things, hence th...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 21:51:05 +0000
Nothey're two different things, hence the two different names

From Roger: no it can't be
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 20:07:29 +0000
no it can't be

From Ocate: Yes
rational numbers are real numbers
irration...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Thu, 22 Aug 2019 18:13:09 +0000
Yes
rational numbers are real numbers
irrational numbers are also real numbers . . not immaginary. . . they are real

From JOHN: A real number cannot be both rational and irra...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:31:59 +0000
A real number cannot be both rational and irrational because a rational real number results from one integer divided by another, whereas an irrational real number, though it exists somewhere on the number line, is never the result of one integer divided by another. And that such numbers do exist, consider a right triangle with sides enclosing the right angle each of length 1. What then is the length of the hypotenuse? The fact is that there are no integers m and n such that m/n exactly measures the hypotenuse. We can however find rational numbers which approximate it closely, in fact as closely as we wish. But the exact length is an irrational number.

From Todd: A real number is anything not imaginary. So, a...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:02:44 +0000
A real number is anything not imaginary. So, anything including "I" is not real. Everything else is. Now, in many computer languages, you have to make a distinction between integers and floating point numbers on purpose, but they're both real. Irrational just means the number can't be formed by a fraction of integers. If you mean both at the same time than no, but both are real.

From Zirp: revised answer because I mixed up irrational w...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190817184133AALHCDh
Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:28:38 +0000
revised answer because I mixed up irrational with imaginary. (hence the 4 thumbs down).
No, because irrational vs rational is a way to categorise, just like odd vs even is. Numbers are called irrational whenever they have a linear value but cannot be expressed as one integer divided by another integer.
the number e is irrational, as is pi and many roots and logaritms