Yahoo Answers: Answers and Comments for Is there any possible way of making 2+2=5? [Programming & Design]
Copyright © Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
From Anonymous
enUS
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:29:27 +0000
3
Yahoo Answers: Answers and Comments for Is there any possible way of making 2+2=5? [Programming & Design]
292
38
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://s.yimg.com/zz/combo?images/emaillogous.png

From Anonymous: Hmmm...take two oranges and put them to your l...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:41:01 +0000
Hmmm...take two oranges and put them to your left...take another two,put them to your right...now put them all together and count them
If you´re older than 3 you´ll hopefully count 4 oranges :D

From Monkeychubs: Yes there is, but it's more a state of min...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:04:01 +0000
Yes there is, but it's more a state of mind  called "doublethink".
Read 1984.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

From Sean G: BECOME NEO! BEND THE MATRIX!
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:52:22 +0000
BECOME NEO! BEND THE MATRIX!

From Ray: Absolutely. Create a variable named 2 or two a...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:15:18 +0000
Absolutely. Create a variable named 2 or two and set that variable's value to 3
thus, 2 + 2 = 5 because one two can be a variable while the other is a value.
instantiate MyNumber as homemandeclass.number
MyNumber.2 = 3
instantiate Result as integer = MyNumber.2 + 2

From kiewkiew: Accidentally add a curl to the second 2, makin...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:57:56 +0000
Accidentally add a curl to the second 2, making it a 3.
2 + 3 = 5!

From Anonymous: Hm....
Use math logic if:
...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:37:00 +0000
Hm....
Use math logic if:
If table logic:
T T = T(rue)
T F = F(alse)
F T = F(alse)
F F = T(alse)
if x={1,2,4,5,...} then 2+2=5

From Anonymous: Only if you can do it.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:33:46 +0000
Only if you can do it.

From Luke: Yes, 2+2=4 usually, but thinking outside the b...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Fri, 09 Dec 2016 01:09:03 +0000
Yes, 2+2=4 usually, but thinking outside the box can result in 2+2=5 all you need to do is this:
1+2=3
2+2=4
There is no 1 in 2+2 but carrying one can result in 5

From Helping: Let s start with some arbitrary variables a an...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sun, 21 Aug 2016 04:13:53 +0000
Let s start with some arbitrary variables a and b where a = b =/= 0
Multiply both sides by a then subtract b^2 (a^2  b^2 = ab  b^2)
Factorize both sides so you have (ab)(a+b) = b(ab)
Divide both sides by (ab) so you have a+b=b
Now a = b so substitute to get b+b=b
Therefore 2b=b
Divide both sides by b to get 2 = 1 then add 3 on both sides
4 = 5 therefore 2+2 = 5
Make sure to read the full Wikipedia article and make sure to understand it (if you do not ask others (friends, family, maths teacher) to explain to you)... This is one of the most important principles in maths that should be known by all mathematicians, physicists and computer scientists (or anyone with grade 4 or so maths, just obviously not in the fancy form found above).

From Soren: Have you ever read 1984?
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:52:43 +0000
Have you ever read 1984?

From Anonymous: Yeah. Just abuse a mathematical axiom with fau...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:59:05 +0000
Yeah. Just abuse a mathematical axiom with faulty logic.
Axiom: n^0 = 1 (Any number n raised to the power 0 equals 1)
Therefore: 1^0 = 2^0.
Simplify by removing exponents: 1=2
Let's add 3 to both sides. 4=5.
2+2 = 4 = 5.
2+2 = 5.

From Sarah: Well you can Try adding 2 1/2 to 2 1/5. It wou...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:26:16 +0000
Well you can Try adding 2 1/2 to 2 1/5. It would be 5. 2 + 2 = 4, and 1/2 + 1/2 = 2/2 AKA 1 whole. Now add the 4 and 1 and you got 5.

From Karitha: 1984. Make yourself love Big Brother and it wi...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Mon, 07 Nov 2016 05:23:51 +0000
1984. Make yourself love Big Brother and it will work.

From borja: There are some techniques that 2+2 can equival...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sun, 02 Oct 2016 12:34:15 +0000
There are some techniques that 2+2 can equivalent 5. The proff that's pronounced precise right here has a branch by using potential of 0 blunders in it. nonetheless, a professional evidence might comprise the use of infinity (a conceptual math ingredient) particularly merely positioned 2+2+INF = 5+INF consequently 2+2=5. Dividing by infinity should not be expressly prohibited, nonetheless, proofs in no way use infinity in them like that. the only valid technique is utilising quantity theory. selection concept is the muse of our mathematical technique particularly merely positioned numbers advance or deimprove in a team trend in accordance with spacing in a quantity line. one million+one million=2 one million+2=3 and various others.... yet, the numbers assigned are arbitrary. We use one million,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 etc..... you need to use yet yet another sequence and all your math may be precise in that sequence. So if we use one million,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,A,10 then in our sequence 2+2=5. there is likewise yet another fuzzy way utilising exponent of 0. It of course says that (2+2)^0 = 5^0 as a result 2+2=5 any quantity ^0 =one million so the above is all ideal. utilising this you additionally can create something out of no longer something. 0^0 = one million..... as quickly as greater, it extremely is recognized that this isn't any longer ideal math, in spite of the undeniable fact that it does adjust to the coolest judgment of evidence to a level. interior the top, there's a innovationsset using the arrival concept, yet I in my opinion do no longer under stand it. That has the backside of : one million/3 = .33333> 2/3 = .66666> for this reason one million = .99999> Now, because of the certainty those 2 isn't particularly equivalent it extremely is pronounced that .99999 > techniques one million For math applications however, we call them equivalent. The evidence has to do with multiplying on that countless separation different than you get a community of one million, that's what you may desire to get 2+2 to equivalent 5. wish I puzzled... Er helped. :)

From prem: it is possible.................by mistake
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:53 +0000
it is possible.................by mistake

From ?: There are many ways this is possible, but one ...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Mon, 04 Jul 2016 18:18:34 +0000
There are many ways this is possible, but one I like to apply is the "nonscientific nonsense method". As you can see, 2 is shaped kind of like a 5, but flipped vertically. If we flip the first 2 vertically and add a dot to the second 2, like it's the end of a sentence, you'll get 5? and a solved problem.

From ?: 2.4 + 2.4 = 4.8
Apply rounding and 2 + 2 = 5.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:50:19 +0000
2.4 + 2.4 = 4.8
Apply rounding and 2 + 2 = 5.

From Chris Cochran: there is an awesome of making this work...... ...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 10:37:31 +0000
there is an awesome of making this work...... so if you just look at 2+2 now take away the plus sign and now you have 2 2 so now what number is that..... (for those of you who are confused the number is 22) now you have to take the 22nd letter of the Alphabet (once again of you cant think of that right away it is V. finally what is V in Roman Numerals..... 5 so with all that being said 2+2 can equal 5

From Makoto: I saw this on http://www.pcworld.com/article/1...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sun, 14 Jun 2015 06:03:55 +0000
I saw this on http://www.pcworld.com/article/184999/strange_questions_yahoo_answers.html?page=2 but to be honest as a programmer this kinda annoyed me because this question is not dumb. Lets say theres a programming language that allows me to modify constants, now i let X be "the first number in order of the expression used to create X" and Y as "the second number in order of the expression used to create Y". Now we change 4 to a variable that equals (4+X)(X/Y). Then 2+2 = 4 = (4+2)(2/2) = 5. Voila 2+2=5.

From nine: e.e. cummings wrote a book called "is 5&...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Mon, 04 May 2015 18:39:06 +0000
e.e. cummings wrote a book called "is 5" and in the introduction he explains how he has done it.

From Anonymous: well there is... imagine 2 guys plus 2 girls.....
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Thu, 03 Jul 2014 15:30:57 +0000
well there is... imagine 2 guys plus 2 girls... one of them uses a condom the other doesnt... after 9 months theyll have the 2 guys the 2 girls and a baby...

From Prakash: Yeah... you can do that
BY MISTAKE
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Fri, 02 May 2014 04:02:38 +0000
Yeah... you can do that
BY MISTAKE

From Shane Grant: I saw this question on the following webpage:
...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:42:47 +0000
I saw this question on the following webpage:
http://people.co.uk/26stupidquestionpeoplehaveaskedtheinternet/
it bothered me. Thus....
1. if x=1.999...infinity, then 10x=19.999...infinity. Subtracting 10x from x gives 9x=18. Dividing both sides results in x=2.
Also proven as...
2. 1/9=0.111...?. 2/9=0.222..... 3/9=0.333......9/9= 0.999...? or 1?
Basically numbers are not a concrete thing and irrational numbers do exist.
Having said that shifting 0.999999recurring to 1 is somewhat different than shifting 4 to 5, though it is not as stupid a question as may have been assumed.

From Honeycoloredhair: Um...?
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:56:48 +0000
Um...?

From Anonymous: No.
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Sat, 07 Sep 2013 00:27:39 +0000
No.

From Booger: This is an easy one...
2+2 = (5 1)
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:22:10 +0000
This is an easy one...
2+2 = (5 1)

From Anonymous: anything is possible, in this case just add an...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:39:40 +0000
anything is possible, in this case just add an extra 1

From Anonymous: There is one werid way. I've read somewher...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:09:20 +0000
There is one werid way. I've read somewhere that some people have devised an adding method using knots.
Imagine 2 small ropes which has 2 knots, one on each end. Now, join both ropes by tying them in a knot in the middle. So 2 knots + 2 knots = 5 knots (2+2=5)

From c?D7j{n^4w#6{y3Vg:JE: I don't know the syntax, but I think in LI...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:58:36 +0000
I don't know the syntax, but I think in LISP you are able to redefine the symbol 2 to semantically mean the equivalent of decimal 2.5.

From Crystel: 1st method:
2+2=5 all you have to do is pu...
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090617032927AAHgaLk
Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:59:12 +0000
1st method:
2+2=5 all you have to do is put one line on one of the two's and it will become life this : 2+3=5
2nd method :
An old man and his son went up the hill.With also a one legged crane.
How many legs were there
I don't get the second mthod...