Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentLaw & Ethics · 1 month ago

why did judges ignore the facts of election fraud when there was evidence such as video, witnesses, affidavits. ?

Update:

They never even looked at the evidence you have to have a hearing to see the evidence

Update 2:

Observers must be able to SEE UP CLOSE the ballots and envelopes for signatures they couldn’t and that was deliberately done in violation. Votes were counted AFTER observers were sent home that is illegal since observers for both sides must be in the room. It is also illegal for minors to work the polls, for any poll worker to be electioneering or for any one side to get special treatment 

Update 3:

It is also illegal to change birthdates on ballots or envelopes if it is unreadable it is invalid 

6 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 month ago

    The witnesses didn't testify in front of the judges.

    The affidavits weren't evidence of fraud.  Some of them stated "facts" that could not be true.  Others stated that election officials had done what the law required them to do; things that it would have been fraud not to do.  My favorite example was the claim that voters who were not in the state where they lived did exactly what voters must do in that situation: mailed ballots back to their home state.  It is fraud to send ballots to be counted in a state where you are visiting; sending them to the state where you do live is the only way of voting that is not fraud.

  • 1 month ago

    I think people did not want to get involved and potentially ruin their careers. Those witnesses who did come forward say they have been threatened and their lives have been negatively impacted. Andtheyare just everyday people, not politicians covering theirasses.

  • 1 month ago

    Sorry for you, but the judges said that your so-called “facts” were not facts at all, they did not prove any fraud at all.

  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    The trump appointed republican judges evaluated the 'evidence' presented to them with the same rigor applied to all court cases.

    As usual, the right's evidence was found to be lacking in credibility. Nothing but conspiracy nonsense and unfounded claims from inbred Chuds.

    Nowhere NEAR enough to topple the most sacred institution this country enjoys. Not for lack of trying though, right TRAITOR?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    Even conservative judges appointed by Trump disregarded what you consider to be facts.

  • sam
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    There is no evidence..

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.