Can someone explain why Christopher Wray has now, three times in his sworn testimony, said no left wingers were involved in the Capitol riot?

Answer 1

Favorite Answer

“We have not to date seen any evidence of anarchist violent extremists or people subscribing to antifa in connection with the 6th," Wray said in testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee at a hearing to address concerns about the intelligence leading up to the riot and the domestic terrorism threat more broadly. "That doesn't mean we're not looking, and we'll continue to look, but at the moment we have not seen that.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/fbi-dire...

There is a difference in saying that there was no evidence of something and saying something is not true.

If asked the same question under oath three times you are likely to get the same answer three times.

Answer 2

So you think Buffalo Bill was a liberal?

Answer 3

Its because they were all Dump scum.

Answer 4

Maybe he is trying to make a point?  

Answer 5

If he actually did testify to that, as you claim, then he just lied.  But lying under oath seems to be what the left has done going back to under Obama, starting with Holder at the beginning with fast and furious. Then you have clapper, rice, to name just a couple.

Answer 6

Because there weren't any. Just watch the Republican Trump butt-kissers start shouting "perjury!" and demanding his resignation because he's refuted their  narrative that Antifa were behind that insurrection. 

Answer 7

There was actual video of at least one black Leftist who was urging on violence.  He 'claimed' to be merely observing.

Obviously, Wray is lying or terribly mis-informed.

Answer 8

Wasn't he the same loon that didn't prosecute FBI people involved in illegalities?

Answer 9

Sounds like Wray just lied under oath. 

Answer 10

Because there were no left wingers involved in any way in the Capitol terroristic attack by Trumpanzees.