Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 2 months ago

Dissent by Justice Thomas in election case draws fire for revisiting baseless Trump fraud claims – So, election fraud not disproven?   ?


This will not be received well by the countless millions of pundits, politicians and especially self-righteous journalists in media, who have looked the public straight in the eye and lied with a straight face saying allegations of fraud are unfounded. Justice Thomas’s ‘parsing’ of words in the dissent is now a matter of public record future elections must be measured by. 

His words illuminate that criminal systemic fraud will by nature not easily be revealed as ‘wide-spread’ and can in fact go undetected, especially when emergency created system adjustments (like for social distancing) prioritize voter accommodation over exacting election accuracy. 

Public confidence in elections is an absolute essential requirement for there to be public confidence in government. New partisan claims of election manipulation relative to the 2022 election cycle from both Parties make clear the nation has no confidence in either at this point.Frankly, signature verification is no longer adequate in the digital age. If currency can be counterfeited so only experts can discern ligitimacy, so can mail-in ballots. A biometric system (fingerprint) is required with appropriate safeguards preventing abuse and should be used for in-person voting as well.


The fact Justice Thomas’s wife is now under attack from highly placed partisan sources because of the wording of this dissent is indication enough that sufficient motivation for ‘wide-spread’ election fraud does indeed exist.

Update 2:

It's of significant interest that multiple answers to this question, one of which I intended to award as my favorite answer, have now gone missing. That certainly raises the specter of cancel-culture or censorship on this platform. That Yahoo continues to deny comments following articles where opinions are far more easily stated in accurate context to subject matter highlights that suspicion as well. 

7 Answers

  • 2 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Remember :

    Trump did not make those Videos of DEM Poll workers rescanning lots of Ballots >4 times!

    Trump did not have all those "Mail in Ballots" Shredded / disposed of weeks after the election !

    Trump did not connect the Dominion servers to the Internet.

    Trump did not give Phil Waldron Evidence & Data showing how Iran, China , and other Countries changed the Data of the American People.

    Trump did not Make the Secretary of State Change Voting laws when the Constitution says only the State Assembly can do so !

    These are factual CRIMES that have not been addressed by our Government !

    Thank you Mr. Thomas ! 

    P.S. This might be why Roberts stopped them from taking the case !(See Photo)

    Attachment image
  • Lv 7
    1 month ago

    he is about ready to open up a can of woop azz

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    All lies, absolutely no real evidence of your claims 

    Justices do not dissent unless they hear the case

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    No, this doesn't mean that election fraud has not been disproven.  What it means is that Thomas is, as he has long been, a partisan hack.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    Yes, Y A is left bias always has been. They constantly shadow ban. That is when you know you are the one telling the truth.

  • ?
    Lv 6
    2 months ago

    CNN said it was baseless, they were lying.

  • 2 months ago

    You have no idea what "dissent" means, obviously.

    Also, nothing he wrote claims that fraud actually happened.

    Please fail again.


    Incidentally - his wife was criticized for what SHE wrote (multiple times), not what he wrote.  And for which she later apologized.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.