Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why should the UK donate vaccines to poor countries?
We bought them and may need them. If we have a surplus then other countries that want them should pay for them.
18 Answers
- HerveLv 61 month ago
The more people have the vaccine globally the sooner it can be controlled and the sooner society can open up.
You are very short-sighted and mean-spirited.
- Anonymous2 months ago
Once the UK has been Inoculated that will be OK as Long as the Cost is part of our Foreign Aid programme
if we Give 10,000,000 to a country and the Vaccine is worth 2 Million then we reduce the cash amount by 2 Million
- Anonymous2 months ago
Why should they have Brexit break with European Union ?
- 2 months ago
Why should you be allowed to breathe air and drink water that could be used by other people?
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- FLv 72 months ago
We don’t even know if we have a surplus. We need about 120 million jabs ( 2 per person, 90% take up). We gave ORDERED 400 million does across the various types, but Idon’t know how many we actually have. Also if one variety shows up a serious problem we don’t want all our eggs in one basket.
As long as we give the excess to third world countries and not the EU who should have organised their own better, that’s fine with me.
- ?Lv 72 months ago
If we have a surplus, it is both gracious and sensible to donate vaccines to poorer countries. We want everyone to be immune, don't we, not just ourselves.
- Anonymous2 months ago
Only when all in britain have been vaccinated.
- ?Lv 72 months ago
If there's an excess of dated vaccines that aren't being used on the native population I can't think of a reason they shouldn't be donated to those in need.
- Anonymous2 months ago
Given that diseases ARE refused entry? Boris comes to mind. With all his worldly hobnobing.
Aside from the blowback, in mutations which obviously WILL observe borders, and hence be BARRED entry into U.K.?
Plus no such thing as 100% no side effects for 100% of the people given it!
Imagine the scenario, a country has rampant disease! No drugs. Only the hardly survive!
Incidentally those countries suffering the most are the future, of trade. The sun is setting on the American empire! And the old declining order knows it.
Besides Russia and China ARE supplying vaccines!
When it comes to future trade.
Imagine! Who wins kudos? Those who helped? Or those who horded and strutted about like a peacock!
- Anonymous2 months ago
No one is safe till everyone is safe