Anonymous asked in Entertainment & MusicPolls & Surveys · 2 months ago

True or false?

Sharks wouldn't be able to survive on land due to the lack off fish? 

5 Answers

  • John
    Lv 5
    2 months ago

    True or they couldn't breed above water

  • 2 months ago


    Lawyers (aka land sharks) will feed on the weak & helpless of any species.

    They are fond of expensive sea food like Sushi if they can charge it to a client. but dont limit their diet to defenseless piscine creatures.

  • Sandy
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    and oxygen, don't forget oxygen. their gills can't obtain oxygen from air any more than our lungs can get oxygen from water.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Starvation would be a lesser concern for beached whales and sharks, as that would not be their immediate concern. They are not designed to live on land.... they are creatures designed for their water habitat.  The notion that whales evolved legs and once walked on land, then evolved away their legs and went back into the ocean is completely stupid. And that poor conclusion and fictional theory came from the minds of those who believe in evolution. The pelvic bones were not originally legs, but the pelvic bones do serve a purpose, and that is to help aid in reproduction. A lot smarter isn't it? That is because God is an intelligent Creator.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 5
    2 months ago

    They seemed to do alright in the 90s cartoon documentary "Street Sharks"

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.