Some lady said that her future husband must be making at least $500k per year, is this dating standards or golddigger?

Answer 1

She’s living in the dark ages. I think she should get an education, earn 500K per year and then look for her equivalent in a husband. 

Answer 2

There is absolutely no standard .It looks she is more keen in earning $ than looking for a husband .

Answer 3

I would say she's a gold digger with high hopes. I had a brother-in-law who would only date a girl who was beautiful. As far as I know, he had one date in his lifetime and died a bachelor at 78. 

Answer 4

Some people value and care about others, and then there are people who value material objects and have no sense of emotion or feeling for others. 

Answer 5

If she earns that much or more it's just standards. If she earns less than that it's gold digging. 

Answer 6

she'll end up alone, gold-digger to me. 

Answer 7

Men make fun of women who have kids with poor guys, then get mad when they want to date rich guys. God. What the hell do you want? 

is she a gold digger? Not really. She has a standard of life she wants and if you can’t provide it, too bad I guess 

Answer 8

That's a gold digger, no question and end of debate.

Unless this 'lady' has the body of an 18 year old, the brain of a 35 year old and a severe case of nymphomania, she's not going to find a husband at all.

Any man who makes $500,000 a year can afford to be picky, and most of them can spot a gold digger a mile away.

Answer 9

She is not going to find many to be her husband. She is a gold digger, and anyone making that kind of money is a lot smarter than her.

Answer 10

All attractive women expect a man to earn £100k just to talk to them, my parents generation just used to meet at dances, i guess that's progress for you.