is wikipedia a reliable source ?

Answer 1

Favorite Answer

If you look at the sources used at the bottom of the article, you'll have many reliable sources to use, and big Wiki articles are pretty reliable. 

Answer 2

No it is not. Anyone can edit pages, and subpar sources are often used to back up claims. This is primarily why teachers rightfully inform their students not to use Wikipedia as a source. 

Answer 3

Not necessarily, but the resource to support what is written should be at the bottom of the article.

Answer 4

No, the Berlin Wall went up 12 August 1961 I know I was On duty on a Nuclear weapons squadron in Germany at the Time Every time i get it changed some Moron changes it back to the 13 August

so i never use Wiki as a source

Answer 5

Yes ,it is! this one trustable source!

Answer 6

yes , but the sources come from the public ..its like freeware , some freeware is excellent , so why pay ..

Answer 7

No.  It is not a peer reviewed source. However, most of the basic information is accurate.  

Answer 8

No. I wouldn't trust anything on that site anymore. The gay community put up some nonsense about genders to try and legitimize their mental disorders and I believe others also put up wrong information for legitimacy. There are to many nefarious people to believe a site where anyone can post any nonsense they want.

Answer 9

No of course not. It has its own agenda of what is fact or fiction