Is a parent injecting irreversible horemones into a young child because they believe there another gender child abuse?Such as jazz jennings?
- Anonymous3 months agoFavorite Answer
You bet your butt it's abuse. And such parents ought to be prosecuted. But what would you expect from parents for which abortion isn't a big problem either?
- donnieLv 73 months ago
This is abuse and should never be done.
- 3 months ago
YES I would say so since gender is not locked in until after they are 12 years old and locked in does not mean always either there are other environmental factors to consider not to mention some people when they get older are Bi so putting any chemicals in a child needlessly is a form of abuse...
- StephenWeinsteinLv 73 months ago
First, it isn't irreversible.
Second, not doing it is irreversible. The purpose is to delay what would normally be irreversible, so that the child can decide when old enough.
Third, if they don't do it, the child often commits suicide. Doing it saves the child's life. That is not abuse. Not doing, and letting the child die as a result, could be.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Songbird JohnLv 43 months ago
Any life-altering medical procedure done on an under-aged child that is not necessary to prevent a deadly disease such as cancer etc. is definitely child abuse. I predict that in 20 years or so there is going to be a huge wave of people launching law suits against their parents for permitting 'gender correction' treatments.
- Anonymous3 months ago
This madness is starting to look like ancient Rome's treatment of children.
Of course, they had a kind of excuse.
They put lead in EVERYTHING; wine, water jugs, lined the aquifers with it.
They were literally an entire civilization suffering brain rotting lead poisoning.