Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureRoyalty · 2 months ago

Are Camilla Parker Bowles & Timothy Laurence only ones married into the royal family to not have blood ties through having royal children ?

Both married into the royal family later in life. Camilla was in her late 50’s when she married Charles in a civil wedding at the Windsor Guildhall. Do Camilla and Timothy lament being the only ones without royal blood connections. Others that married into the family have blood connections through their royal children. 

Update:

@Rico: we all likely have blood ties to the royals if we research that far back in history, all the way to Charles II! 

I doubt that Camilla feels that makes her a close blood relative to her own husband and his family.  lol

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Clo
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    They do not lament that they don't have children with their royal spouses. They are just happy to be married to the people they love.

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Having children may affect one's sanity, but it does not affect sanguinity. 

  • Rico
    Lv 5
    2 months ago

    Camilla does have a blood tie to the House of Windsor.  It’s a proven fact that she’s a descendant of Charles II. 

    Neither the Duchess nor the Vice Admiral lament not having children with their respective spouses and they are not the only ones in the extended family who has yet to become the biological parent of a person with Windsor blood. 

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    Jack Brooksbank has no children with Princess Eugenie as yet. For most people, being married is considered sufficient to become a member of their spouse's family.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.