Why isn't the government banning citizen gun ownership now?
Right now because all of the people are rioting and being dangerous, we need to take away all guns from everyone so that people can complain all they want about that cop and that africo-americo man but they can't do anything about it.
- miyuki & kyojinLv 73 weeks ago
Why? Because Lunatic Left Democrap not POTUS now. People need guns for self-defense from looters. You LLDs want take away citizens' best means of self-defense while releasing hundreds of looters upon them. That is evil, dumb and insane. You sound like Garry the Democrap Troll.
- ?Lv 64 weeks ago
The only things stopping governments from banning gun ownership are the 2nd Amendment, President Trump, the Supreme Court of the US and the US Senate.
- SammyLv 54 weeks ago
Because only law-abiding, responsible, noncriminals would comply. Anyone who would use a gun in a crime would keep theirs.
- Anonymous4 weeks ago
Make no mistake it will happen and very soon!
Some of the answers here are laughable.
If a mass of people desigded to storm your home and even f every family member was armed the mob would still win.
That unless every family member had a gatling gun!
Still what fun to live in a country where you are so scared you have to be armed to the teeth!
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- JOHN BLv 64 weeks ago
The covid-19 spoke loudly to new liberal gun owners that guns have been deemed a necessary commodity.
- RickLv 64 weeks ago
they can't, read the Constitution sometime .............
- 1 month ago
why? imagine this.
rioters have been calling out murdering AND RAPING white women and children.
imagine being in your home, with your wife and kids, and you see the rioters breaking into peoples houses and just taking what they want and destroying the rest.
the rest of the world would be begging for mercy. sitting in their own damn house terrified.
but USA citizens would grab the damn AR15, hide the women and children, secure the house, and the muzzle at the door and hope that SOB holds, because if it doesnt. god is going to have to sort em out.
- 1 month ago
Let's see: ban guns to make a "safer riot". By that logic, then "they" should ban: sticks, knives, fire-bombs, clubs, fists, feet, assorted "hand-held assault devices", out-of-towners, looters, drinking on the street, masks to hid the perp's identity, and overall "not-nice-behavior".
Alternative skill set to limit damage: Arrest, Detain, no-bail, any one caught in malicious acts against people, public/private property, disobeying the lawful commands of "police, etc".
Which option seems more logical? Allow destruction, or stop destruction.
These riots have nothing to do with someone that these rioters don't even know. The bad cops with be indited, and I hope get life in prison, or worst. They are a poor example of people in uniform to serve and protect.
Your answer will dictate your emotional maturity.
- Steel RainLv 71 month ago
Fire bombs are more dangerous than guns. There is no way to ban 300 million guns.
- wind_updollLv 71 month ago
They’re in the process of enacting a 30% tax on guns and ammo into law