Jesus In Roman History Books?
The Romans wrote about Jesus in their history books, you know, secular books outside the Bible. The Romans talked about Jesus' life, death by crucifixion, and trial before Pilate. Historians around the time of Jesus talked about Him. I guess Jesus actually existed. What do you say?
- JeancommunicatesLv 71 month agoFavorite Answer
Not only did He exist, but He made such an impact upon this world that mankind split time BC/AD because of Him. In the Constitution of the USA and specifically in the dateline before the signing it reads "In the year of Our Lord" and our Lord in America is the Lord Jesus Christ.
- DocLv 61 month ago
By any chance , did you get these history books at The Ark Encounter gift shop, along with a pack of crayons?
- DougLv 71 month ago
The Jews also wrote about Jesus, in the Talmud (Rabbinical Commentary). The had absolutely nothing good to say about him; Probably to justify their rejection of him and their outright treachery against him. All of this provides excellent proof of the actual historical existence of Jesus Christ.Source(s): www.askmeaboutgod.org
- PaulLv 71 month ago
Why would Roman historians write about Jesus? To them He was just one of thousands of troublemakers they executed.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 1 month ago
Jesus of Nazareth and Davy Crockett of Tennessee both MAY HAVE existed.
But the songs, stories, and even motion pictures ABOUT Mr. Davy are not PROOF that he REALLY DID kiill him a bear, when he was only three, or that he teamed up with legendary frontiersman Mike Fink, to battle river pirates.
In like manner, songs, stories, and motion pictures about Mr. Jesus are not proof that he was the son of a human woman and one of the gods, or that he rose from the ded, or that he farted hard enough to propel himself so high into the sky, that eventuallu, a cloud hid him from sight.
- 1 month ago
History doesn't save anyone. Living by the true teaching of Jesus does.
- BillLv 41 month ago
Here are some relevant comments on the subject
- MackLv 71 month ago
I say cite a single source for that bs. :)
- JeaLv 71 month ago
No he wasn't. No actual record has any mention of Jesus, until long after his fake "demise". Just because you want something to be true, doesn't make it so. Jesus was never a historical person, or a person at all, he was invented by politicians to gain unfair advantage. The church uses the same tool today. Jesus is a tool, not a person,
- 1 month ago
Not ONE SINGLE LEGITIMATE PERSON contemporary to the time that christ would have been alive EVER wrote about him. No historian, no author, no official scribe, no other government official... NOBODY. Just the fake BuyBull-cult writings and people who wrote about him later SECOND HAND to perpetuate the myth.