Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 week ago

Why do libtards hate our involvement in iraq?

Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction and helped Al Qaeda and ISIS. They should be thanking Bush that New York City didn't get nuked off the map by terrorists

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 week ago
    Favorite Answer

    It triggers them that we deliver democracy to formally socialist countries.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 week ago

    ISIS did not even exist while Saddam was alive. And Al Qaeda was located in Afghanistan at the time we invaded Iraq. Saddam could not nuke anyone because Israel bombed and destroyed his nuclear facility before 9/11 ever

    happened.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • M
    Lv 6
    1 week ago

    Trump is the one pulling out of Iraq, Libya, the whole middle east and gave it to Russia's Vladimir Putin. Be thankful Trump wont get re-elected.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 week ago

    There were no weapons of mass destruction.  ISIS didn't exist then.  Al Qaeda was in Afghanistan.  You're batting 1,000 not.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 week ago

    HISTORY LESSON

    Clearly you weren’t around back then.

    Bush took heavy criticism for going into Iraq so right after it was over, Bush requested that the UN send in a team to find Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) which were supposedly chemical weapons.

    UNSCOM headed by Hans Blix found no WMD in Iraq.

    To Bush’ credit, at least, he didn’t have US special ops plant a fake stash of WMD in Iraq for the upcoming inspection.

    Al Qaeda fought AGAINST Saddam and when Saddam fell the region was taken over by ISIS.

    Saddam was NEVER suspected of having nukes but he did use chemical weapons against people in a region of his own country many years earlier.

    So the next time you challenge a NY liberal make sure you know what you are talking about, anonymous dope.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 week ago

    Libs have redefined wmds so they can be negative about the war since someone that disagrees with them initiated it.

    Source(s): Reality
    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 week ago

    sadaam had no weapons of mass destruction , that claim was made based on a fake dossier written by a university student in the UK , he also hated al quaeda, and the taliban and isis , bush made a huge mistake and regardless of orientation there is no way to deny that

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 week ago

    Colin Powell lied. 🥴 There were no weapons.

    So basically GW BUSH started a war and involved our allies for nothing. Except establish Capitalism abroad through oil sales.

    🥴 That's WHY the Senate Repubs were pxssed off more so than the Democrats... when Trump pulled our troops out of Syria.

    That oil is their bread and butter.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 week ago

    I feel like this is a troll question. Yikes

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.