Ray S
Lv 7
Ray S asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 month ago

Is Trump's defense going to be an effort to validate Russian propaganda about Burisma, the Bidens, and the mythical server?

Update:

Daro ... The crime isn't investigating a Democrat. Trump's high crime is scheming to get a foreign government involved in rigging our November election to favor himself. And, he was risking national security and using taxpayer assets to do it.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Daro
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    Nope.

    Mostly it is the president and his Justice departments job to investigate alleged crimes , even crimes by  Democrats. Apparently investigating a Democrat is now a "high crime or....."

    *** Note If the crime is rigging the 2016 election Trump was not president at that time. Is this crack day in liberal loonieland?

    • ...Show all comments
    • Daro
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Nothing for Trump to defend. No crime, just disillusioned Demokkkrats pizzed that America rejected their communist vision. Thats not illegal.....yet. They been trying to make up a crime (or something they can pass off as one) from day one. Mueller report exposed that.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    Trump's defense does use Russian propaganda. Burisma I think was a very corrupt company, as are many in the Ukraine and Russia. That does not mean everyone working for them was or is.

    Rick Perry's backers got huge gas deal in Ukraine while he was the U.S. Energy Secretary. Perry’s efforts to influence Ukraine’s energy policy came, just as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s new government was seeking military aid from the United States to defend against Russian aggression and allies of President Donald Trump were ramping up efforts to get the Ukrainians to investigate his Democratic rival Joe Biden.

    Not everyone working for Enron was corrupt too. Jeffrey Skilling certainly was.

    • Elwood Blues
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Is that hearsay?  Remember when republicans used to ask for first person witnesses when criminal accusations were made?  I guess you only need first person witnesses when you accuse Trump.  Otherwise rumors and hearsay are fine.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • There can't be any defense unless the prosecutors make an actual case against him first. Otherwise there's nothing to defend against.

    It doesn't look like that's going to happen.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    lol, it seems to be, they really seem to want to get Joe and Hunter Biden on the stand, I don't see how they think this will help their case, what is Hunter Biden going to say, "I don't know anything about anything" and Joe will just get a chance to explain how what he did was at the direction of the white house and the state department, I think the dems should allow it, it is almost certain to blow up in the presidents face

    • ...Show all comments
    • Ray S
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Raisin Caine ...You're conflating official U.S. foreign policy that had the backing of our European allies and the IMF with Trump's use of his office and U.S. assets for the sole purpose of getting something for himself, not the U.S. ... The two are, in no way, the same thing.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    No. 

    The simplest defense is to use the Democrats own arguments. 

    Let's see. Your Democrats said that a Ukrainian official said Biden and Hunter did nothing wrong.  Cool. Ukrainian officials have said that Trump did nothing wrong. 

    Your Democrats said there was no reason to look into Biden because the Obama DOJ already said nothing wrong. Cool Trump DOJ said Trump did nothing wrong. 

    You are stuck on asking the US public to hold two opposing views in their head at the same time. 

    If you can look at what Hunter Biden was doing and say... no reason to investigate at all, then why are you investigating Trump? 

    If you can say that money was critical to US national security for Trump, then it was also critical for Biden. 

    It is OK to investigate Trump, but not Biden. It is OK to use impeachment investigation as a tool to affect the 2020 election, but Trump can't use an investigation to do that. 

    No matter what argument you make, you ask the US public to ignore you doing and getting away with the same thing. 

    I am constantly entertained here, because I ask question and get to watch the democrats dance a little jig where they say logically opposing things at the same time. 

    And the funniest part.   Look at LSP. The defense has not started their opening statement and that idiot thinks they have. He pretends to be smarter than everyone else. HILARIOUS!!!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    No. The defense will be...…..you have proven nothing save that you are political hacks.....AND butt hurt ones at that.

    The Democrats have NO legitimate evidence. How can Anyone that has the (brains) ability to log onto Y politics be dumb enough to think what the democrats presented is credible evidence ……….?????? It boggles the mind !!   

    • Lv 6
      1 month agoReport

      you should go see a doctor to get your head surgically removed from your ars 

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Mike
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    You are mentally ill 

    • Ray S
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      You suffer from TDS.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    The democrats have spent 3 days repeating Russian propaganda. 

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.