Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureRoyalty · 1 month ago

Can royal folk such as Prince Andrew, Prince Charles, Camilla, and Princess Anne still be canonised in the Church of England ?

They all have lived less than virtuous lives. Unlike the Queen, who so dutifully has been so virtuous. What, with their adultery and Andrew’s involvement with sex traffickers of teenaged girls how can they ever possibly be canonised? It seems that some may sadly look to Camilla for witchcraft inspiration instead of for an example of Christian virtues. What a sad state of affairs for her majesty at this time of her spiritual journey as she reflects on the sordid lives of her children. Edward excluded as he has always been respectful of his mother the Queen’s values. 

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 weeks ago

    Infidelity is one thing. What Prince Andrew is accused of doing is entirely different, and criminal. Infidelity is not criminal. At least it isn’t in the US or UK. The chances of any of these people being canonized are virtually nonexistent. 

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Clo
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    Yet another anti-royal rant posted by an anonymous asker obsessed by Camilla and Charles...the imperfections of a human royal family who are not infallible.

    In order to be made a saint, that person must be found to have performed something so worthy, martyrdom being one...it is not easy being made a saint in the Anglican Church and there aren't many modern day saints.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saints_in_Anglicanis...

    The ninth Lambeth Conference held in 1958 clarified the commemoration of Saints and Heroes of the Christian Church in the Anglican Communion. Resolution 79 stated:    In the case of scriptural saints, care should be taken to commemorate men or women in terms which are in strict accord with the facts made known in Holy Scripture.    In the case of other names, the Calendar should be limited to those whose historical character and devotion are beyond doubt.    In the choice of new names economy should be observed and controversial names should not be inserted until they can be seen in the perspective of history.    The addition of a new name should normally result from a widespread desire expressed in the region concerned over a reasonable period of time.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    None of them have been canonized, nor are they likely to be.  Even the Queen hasn't been.  Becoming a "canon" is a pretty big thing in the Anglican Church.  They are actually pretty rare.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    as long as they Cannonise Diane First

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    Not something the Church of England does nowadays.  Pre-reformation saints include St Edward the Confessor, but the only post-reformation canonization was King Charles I. High church Anglicans who regarded Charles's execution as a martyrdom, recognise King Charles, the Martyr (canonized in 1660) and accord him a saint's day on 30 January; this appeared in old editions of the Book of Common Prayer.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • PAMELA
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    The catholics canonise people, not the church of england.

  • 1 month ago

    Isn't 'canonising' done within the Roman Catholic Church - NOT the C of E?   Even if any of those you mention here, for some weird reason, were ever likely to be canonised - LOL.

    • we the Anglican Catholic church have many saints

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    I suppose they could be if they perform a miracle or something. Saints have had dicey lives.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • The Church of England doesn't really go in for canonisation. 

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.