promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted
Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 3 months ago

Isn't Marxism-Leninism the best option?

Human trafficking and drug trafficking van be stopped. Prostitution can be stopped. And corruption will be greatly reduced. Human trafficking is a big business and capitalists will not stop Human trafficking. 

Update:

Even the CIA said that the Soviets had better nutrition. Bread lines are better than homeless people starving. And business leaders say that US is the most corrupt country in the world. 

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Pepega
    Lv 5
    3 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Marxism Leninism is the only real democracy and freedom.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Zirp
    Lv 7
    3 months ago

    pointless question without your definition of "marxism-leninism"

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 3 months ago

    You must live in a world of make believe.

    They have drug problems in China and they had drug problems in the USSR.

    Prostitution never went away in either country either.

    And what you call human trafficking they call infiltration.

    They sneak their operatives in with the rest of the masses.

    Lets face it the Soviet leadership was extremely corrupt.

    The citizens would stand in lines for bread while they dined on caviar.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    Conservatives are correct, of course, in viewing communism as a serious danger, an evil which should be opposed. But — and this is the essence of the matter — conservatives oppose communism for the wrong reasons. They see it, first and foremost, as a threat to free enterprise: a threat to their bank accounts. What they really hate about communism is that it is collectivist (i.e., that it subordinates the welfare of the individual to the welfare of the community — at least, in theory) and that it is statist (i.e., that it vests ultimate authority in a highly centralized party-government apparatus instead of in more-or-less autonomous local governments).

    But if collectivism and statism were the only aspects of communism we had to worry about, I, for one, would welcome it with open arms, as an infinitely superior alternative to the Jew-ridden, minority-coddling, culture-defiling, soul-stifling, filth-wallowing, corruption-breeding, decadence-producing, race-destroying monstrosity of a System which now squats so unwholesomely in the power centers of our nation (and which, of course, is also collectivist and statist, in the worst sense of the words, even if not so forthrightly as the Kremlin).

    No, the real evils of communism are that it, like capitalism, is alien to us in origin and essence; and it, also like capitalism, is racially destructive. The doctrine of communism was born in the alien mind of Karl Marx (ne Levi); and it, as a doctrine which interprets history and all social phenomena solely in economic terms, predicates the primacy of gold over blood.

    It is true that a perceptive minority of conservatives has awakened to the fact that big capitalism, private monopoly capitalism, is by no means antithetical to communism (state capitalism). They have finally reached a vague understanding, after years of observing the backslapping camaraderie between Western capitalists, like the Rockefellers, and the masters of the Kremlin, that the fundamental values of the two systems have certain similarities — that they are merely variations on the same economic materialist theme.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.