Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Arts & HumanitiesBooks & Authors · 1 month ago

Is it okay to write a mystery in reverse chronological order?

I am taking a creative writing course and I chose mystery as my genre for my final project. I am wondering if it would be okay to write in reverse chronology for this or would it go against the classic form? I want to start with the discovery of the body and work backwards from there with different POVs in order to come together and find out what happened to the victim. 

7 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    Well you said it’s for a creative writing course. Sounds pretty creative to me.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    You are the author and thus may write in any style you wish. You first, in this instance, though, figure out how you will build suspense already knowing what happened after every event in your book

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Athena
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    First, there is a reason the "form" is called "classic."

    Second, so you start with who did it and we have to work our way back to who the victim actually was? Why would I waste my day on that?

    THAT is the question you need to answer. WHY am I devoting my time to YOUR story the ending of which I already know?

    Answer THAT and it could work.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    I've read at least two short stories that used that technique.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Marli
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    The autopsy and the detectives' crime scene investigation skills should determine what happened to the victim and how, when and where.

    The questions to answer before "the end" are "Who killed her?" and "Why was she murdered?"

    So a good investigator would investigate her past to find out.

    Good going, and good writing to you.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    The classic form requires you to play fair with the reader. The reader gets all the clues that the detective does, so that when they get to the page before the detective reveals the killer, they can reach the same conclusion as the detective. (Some comic books of the 1930s and 1940s actually had a challenge to the reader at the bottom of a page, with words to the effect that "You've seen all the evidence - can you name the killer before you turn the page?")

    I don't believe there's anything in the "rules" of the classic form that says the reader has to get the clues in the same *order* as the detective. So if you think it's more interesting to work in reverse order, go ahead.

    Many murder mysteries kind of work in reverse order anyway. You start with the discovery of the body, then you find out how he was killed, or how he arrived in the place where he was killed, then work out where he was or what he was doing before that, and so on.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Andrew
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    The only rules for writing a good mystery are to make it exciting and to keep the reader guessing right up until the end. Aside from that, you can do whatever you want. As long as everything makes sense in the end and it all fits together, you ought to be fine to tell the story any way you like. 

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.