Tell ME atheists: Why is a 10,0000 year old BONE proof but the Bible is not?

36 Answers

Relevance
  • David
    Lv 7
    1 month ago
    Favorite Answer

    Anything before recorded history (about 2300 BC) is speculative and uses unproven assumptions to come up with dates. Truth does not need to hide behind unproven presuppositions (like materialism, naturalism). Atheists are assuming old age to prove old age; delusional, inconsistent, illogical and irrational to fabricate something then believe it to be factual w/o evidence.

    Adopting an unproven (and arguably disproved) presupposition as an exclusionary priori prevents one from following the evidence where ever it leads thereby precluding science from being an honest search for the truth. If the scientific method is valid, it does not need priori's!

    Evolution and the supporting myth of millions/billions of years are nothing more than a speculative ideas that have no basis in science.

    We know we can't rely on science for ancient history. In 1963, a geologist counted 46 different theories for dinosaur extinctions by the scientific community, and many more have been added since then.

    Probably only the cause of the Pleistocene ice age has generated as many bewildering theories. (As of 1968, there were 60 theories for the cause of the ice age). Science has never been the authority on history.

    What were the ASSUMPTIONS used to come up with this 10,000 year old date? Oops, atheists don't confirm assumptions, just jump to conclusions from OPINION. This question ASSUMES some bone is how old? Anyone can assume anything they want, but to draw conclusions would be confusing reality with irrationality.

    That men can speculate about the meaning of artifacts, including adding religious interpretations, has no bearing whatsoever on Christianity, or its actual history.

    • ...Show all comments
    • antonius
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Your priests or other  handlers thought they were so damn smart decided to refer to us as atheists, and now you David, are complaining. You delusional nuts cases will never win LOL, and you even have that Jesus thingie to help and guide you. How's that working!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    Because the Bible is mythology 

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    your stupidity is so amazing!! your god would be so ashamed.....thanks for the hearty LAUGH though

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    A 10,000 year old bone is proof that an animal of a certain species lived 10,000 years ago.

    A 2,000 year old bible is proof than an author wrote a story 2,000 years ago.

    Can you do the math?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 month ago

    Hello, Troll!

    Bishop Ussher used The Bible to calculate when the First Day of Creation began.

    If you BELIEVE the Book of Genesis, etc, then you BELIEVE there are no bones older than 6,503 years, since there were no animals before then. No animals=no bones.

    Asking about ANYTHING older than that, exposes you as a person who does not accept the Bible as historically and scientifically accurate.

    Since doubting the Bible condemns us BOTH to HELL, I can only HOPE that we don't end up cellmates.

  • 1 month ago

    Ah, the bone was created by god, while the Bible is a product of man.

    • sk8terboy1963
      Lv 4
      1 month agoReport

      Uh, no, your god thingy didn't.  There is no evidence to support that is even possible.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    If you need someone to tell you, you wouldn't understand anyway, so what's the point?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    Because the bone exists as real and the bible exists as a plagiarized fantasy.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Babs
    Lv 4
    1 month ago

    The bone is reliable evidence of the existence of a life form from long ago. 

    The Bible is proof that ancient people told stories about supernatural beings. It is not evidence that those stories are true.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 month ago

    A bone, the bible, or anything, may be used as evidence.

    A 'Proof' requires a proper progression of logic.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.