Regarding a recent question; what exactly does attacking the President's underage non-political minor child prove to anyone?
Seriously Liberals, I don't think that really helps your cause in any measurable way.
- ShiloLv 71 month ago
The underage minor wasn't attacked; his name was invoked to ridicule the president's behavior.
- yLv 71 month ago
With the numbers that defend or spin the attack from not only the flock, but their elected leadership. Did you really think you would get a meaningful answer?
It is one think for members of the flock on either side to go after the kids. It shows how low they are. It is another when elected officials do it or their supposed educated witnesses do.
- Weasel McWeaselLv 71 month ago
and in relation that recent question........I will REPEAT my answer *again* in case YOU didn't see it.
and just WHO "attacked" his son?
His name was referenced , in a discussion about the difference between a president and a king.
I heard no one "attack" him.......call him names, belittle him, or call him out---personally--- in any way, shape or form.
There was not a damn thing wrong with the reference...........but she aplogized anyway, because republicans cried SOOOOOOOO hard, because the boys mere NAME was mentioned.
well, Trump DOES have a son named Barron, right????? It's not exactly a SECRET is it?
And when Trump went to the world series game..........yeah, gee.........you'd THINK he take his ***SON*** to the ball game.
Instead he took Matt Gaetz. Yeah, father of the year, right there.
I am sure his son, didn't want to go the world series, anyway, right?
so stop your Faux OUTRAGE, just because she used the word "BARON" in reference to the difference between KINGS and Presidents-
The kids name is BARRON. She used the word "Baron" in reference to Royal Titles......but I wouldn't expect cons to know the difference.
- TB12Lv 71 month ago
As opposed to the way y'all went after Obama's daughters,, or Chelsea Clinton when she was a minor,,, how exactly did that help your cause
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- ZackLv 71 month ago
They didn't attack Barron. You just think that because that's what Trump and Faux News said. Quit listening to Trump.
- RockItLv 71 month ago
It proves that liberals are so degenerate that they take pleasure attacking minor children in front of millions of Americans.
- Maga MyersLv 41 month ago
It proved Karlan's testimony was hate based.
- scott bLv 71 month ago
No one attacked anyone. It what way is saying, "You can name your son Barron, but you can't make him a Baron" attacking him. Another faux outrage by the GOP to try to distract from crimes they can't defend.
- 1 month ago
you are just mad that liberals are more educated than you
- Anonymous1 month ago
There's no attack. . The barons are coming.