How well armed do you think the bodyguards of Hollywood anti gun lefties are?
I’m willing to bet 98% of the anti gun celebrities who want to repeal the second amendment, or to make guns useless for defense by limiting them to 3 bullets in a clip, or flat out ban any and all forms of fire arms and then anything that could conceivably be used as a weapon, have bodyguards with Kevlar bulletproof vests and at least one semi automatic handgun with a magazine larger than 10 rounds and maybe one or two smaller more easily concealed hand guns
So how is that practicing what they preach? Shouldn’t they get rid of armed bodyguards?
- Pearl LLv 72 months agoFavorite Answer
hopefully pretty good
- StephenWeinsteinLv 72 months ago
They should have unarmed bodyguards, because an unarmed person is more effective for defense. There have been cases where unarmed bystanders (a "good guy" without a gun) had to stop shooters who were trying to kill Presidents, because the armed bodyguards (Secret Service agents) couldn't.
Anything more than 3 bullets in a clip is useless for defense, because if you haven't hit the "bad guy" with one of the first 3 bullets, then either you're already down or you're not a target and you didn't need to "defend" yourself. Limiting the number of bullets makes a gun less useful for murder, but doesn't reduce (and may increase) its usefulness for defense.
- JamesLv 72 months ago
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 if they succeed in limiting guns for the gun nuts, it would also limit them for their “bodyguards” too. It would only be hypocritical, if they were exempted from the law.
- 2 months ago
the problem with questions like this is that gun nuts and stupid rednecks automatically assume that when people are critical of the lack of sensible gun laws in america, that equates to wanting to repel the 2nd amendment or to outlaw guns completely
sorry but your tinfoil propaganda is a load of garbage and hogwash
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 2 months ago
Wrong category, Ted Nugent