DS M
Lv 6
DS M asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 3 weeks ago

Will Schiff be bold enough to allow the FBI investigate how much Dems coordinated with the whistleblower before blowing the whistle?

or testify about the evidence he said he saw for 2 years during his Russian hoax scandal?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 3 weeks ago
    Favorite Answer

    If you weren't such a dumazz you would realize the FBI is part of the executive branch of govt and not the legislative.

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      3 weeks agoReport

      You can't say where Dems can come clean from Schiff, the liar who lies for years and who promises things he can't deliver.  Wasn't last week as painful for you as it was for the TV ratings which featured Schiff's flopping?

  • 3 weeks ago

    Of course the WB coordinated with the Democrats; doing that with the Republicans would have blown the confidentiality that all WB's are afforded under the Whistle Blower Protection Act. If you're going to blow the whistle on your boss, you don't go to the boss and blow that whistle. C'mon guy....

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Exactly...but...if you didn't notice, Obama isn't in the WH  but he was when Hillary was leaking classified documents,killing Ambassadors, selling 20% of the US uranium, and buying a Russian dossier as an insurance policy to influence the election.  

  • 3 weeks ago

    LOL

    More of the "Deep State' nonsense?

    You Trump minions really need some new excuses.

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Don "Schiff" Knotts is the guy that swore for literally years that he saw evidence that no one on the Dem side now wants him to disclose.  Why don't you let Nancy give a 5 minute speech outlining the Dem position or are you afraid of how her ability to think is as bad as the Dem pres. debates?

  • 3 weeks ago

    Unlike Chump, Schiff isn’t afraid of the FBI investigations .

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Don "Schiff" Knotts is the guy that swore for literally years that he saw evidence that no one on the Dem side now wants him to disclose. Why don't you let Nancy give a 5 minute speech outlining the Dem position or are you afraid of how her ability to think is as bad as the Dem pres. debates?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • joedlh
    Lv 7
    3 weeks ago

    Why would the FBI waste its time on an unfounded conspiracy theory that would be easily disproved?

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Easy?  I see you can't.  Don't call yourself stupid.  You are just a VICTIM of public schools.  Here is a pretty pink participation ribbon for you!  🎀

  • Anonymous
    3 weeks ago

    Would it be a good idea for any president to use law enforcement to cast suspicion on his political rivals based on nothing but conspiracy theories?

    Imagine if that happened, how much trust would people have in law enforcement?

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Or when Nancy looks drunk and slurs her words when she speaks, that is good for the Dem party and therefore the country?

  • 3 weeks ago

    The Russia investigation turned up a lot of corruption, you must be thinking of the Benghazi hoax.

    So you think the whistle blower should not have been vetted before moving forward?

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      5 days agoReport

      Or that the drug addict didn't sleep with his dead brother's widow weeks after his brother died and didn't publicly state he would have gotten the job if he wasn't Joe's son?  What vetting is needed.  We just need to validate the Bidens were telling the truth.

  • 3 weeks ago

    The whistleblower, for whatever reason, made accusations. 

    The whistleblower, for whatever reason, spoke with people. 

    The whistleblower's accusations were investigated and found to be 100% credible. 

    What else did you want to know? 

    • DS M
      Lv 6
      3 weeks agoReport

      "The whistleblower's accusations were investigated and found to be credible."  Really?  Have you read the transcripts or are you forbidden to read or think anything that the Dems don't have on there list?

  • 3 weeks ago

    After the IG was scheduled to testify December 11 about the Russian hoax. You can just feel the desperation from the left. I mean it's actually palpable. And Schiff's eyes are extra buggy today.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.