what the hell is the definition of a good taste in music these days?

I have no clue? I'm stuck in 2002....

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Good taste, being subjective, never did have much of a connection with the Zeitgeist of popular music.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 2 months ago

    As has always been the case, musical taste is very subjective, and often depends on the peer group thinking more than the merits of the music. It is a social group identification indicator, to varying extent (some individuals are way more pliant than others), much like clothing styles.  The two are often linked pretty strongly, actually.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    I think that "Beethoven and Bach are great, and Debussy is putrid twinkle twinkle twiddle" is just as good a definition now as it was 17 years ago.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Granted the latest music waves seem to be vapid

    yet many of the lyrics are very, very good.

    We all have the tendency to be very attached to

    the music of our most free - from -the rat-race years!

    Search out recent composers and such - there's  some    good music around

    although much of it is progressive since 2002 :) an acquired taste for many of us

    no longer in our greener years. 

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    There has never been a universal definition of 'good taste in music'. One person's 'good taste' is another person's snoozefest; one person's inspiring traditional folk song may be another person's unbearable kitch.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Beauty is in the ear of the beholder.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Melodious .....!

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.