Haha! Democrats "STAR WITNESSES" have NOTHING but Hearsay? How much more pathetic will the rest of them be?
- Anonymous3 weeks agoFavorite Answer
He he. Gordon Sondland is going to give first hand information. He better if he wants to stay out of prison. Michael Cohen is in prison because he lied to Congress. Sondland will be heading to prison if he lies. Besides, someone pointed out that lots of people have been convicted by hearsay evidence and that hearsay evidence is sometimes more accurate than direct testimony. This is not even a criminal court, and therefore hearsay evidence is automatically admissible. No judge has to make a ruling before it is admissible.
- NinefingerLv 63 weeks ago
If those were the star witnessed. The Democrats are in serious trouble
- RickLv 63 weeks ago
They are jumping off a cliff and it's a LONG way down ...................
- Fox News CultistLv 53 weeks ago
worried about something, snowflake? less pathetic than fake president, traitor trump
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- scott bLv 73 weeks ago
This was just the first day. Vindman testifies soon, and he was ON the call. Plus, we also have the "transcript" from TRUMP himself, which clearly implicates him in crime.
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
When you're a Trump toadie, all evidence against Trump is "hearsay". These ignorant right-wingers have NO idea how evidence is introduced and testimony taken in legal proceedings. That's probably because 90 percent of Trump's defenders don't live in the U.S.
- 3 weeks ago
He was sure that information was correct even though it was already 4th or maybe 5th hand knowledge. But it was nice of him to confirm no quid pro quo.
- DavidLv 73 weeks ago
If that's the best they've got, Trump has no worries. None of this testimony would be admissible in a court of law.
- 3 weeks ago
You mean the hearsay that US diplomats, ambassadors and even the transcript corroborated? Try again, schmuck.