Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 3 weeks ago

Haha! Democrats "STAR WITNESSES" have NOTHING but Hearsay? How much more pathetic will the rest of them be?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    3 weeks ago
    Favorite Answer

    He he. Gordon Sondland is going to give first hand information. He better if he wants to stay out of prison. Michael Cohen is in prison because he lied to Congress. Sondland will be heading to prison if he lies. Besides, someone pointed out that lots of people have been convicted by hearsay evidence and that hearsay evidence is sometimes more accurate than direct testimony. This is not even a criminal court, and therefore hearsay evidence is automatically admissible. No judge has to make a ruling before it is admissible.

  • 3 weeks ago

    If those were the star witnessed. The Democrats are in serious trouble

  • Rick
    Lv 6
    3 weeks ago

    They are jumping off a cliff and it's a LONG way down ...................

  • 3 weeks ago

    worried about something, snowflake? less pathetic than fake president, traitor trump

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 3 weeks ago

    This was just the first day. Vindman testifies soon, and he was ON the call. Plus, we also have the "transcript" from TRUMP himself, which clearly implicates him in crime.

    • You need to improve your reading comprehension. Nothing President Trump said can be construed as a crime. Not one of the expert witnesses has been ale to highlight any crime on the call yet, including yesterday's witnesses when asked the question directly.

  • 3 weeks ago

    "Um, he's sick. My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who saw Ferris pass out at 31 Flavors last night. Guess it's pretty serious."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KS6f1MKpLGM

    Youtube thumbnail

  • Anonymous
    3 weeks ago

    When you're a Trump toadie, all evidence against Trump is "hearsay".  These ignorant right-wingers have NO idea how evidence is introduced and testimony taken in legal proceedings.  That's probably because 90 percent of Trump's defenders don't live in the U.S.

    • No, hearsay is when you were not a witness but you are relaying what someone told you happened. All the witness not on the call have only hearsay evidence.

  • 3 weeks ago

    He was sure that information was correct even though it was already 4th or maybe 5th hand knowledge. But it was nice of him to confirm no quid pro quo.

  • David
    Lv 7
    3 weeks ago

    If that's the best they've got, Trump has no worries. None of this testimony would be admissible in a court of law.

    • -j.
      Lv 7
      3 weeks agoReport

      It's amazing how little "the law and order party" understands about any of this.  Just amazing.

  • 3 weeks ago

    You mean the hearsay that US diplomats, ambassadors and even the transcript corroborated? Try again, schmuck.

    • Who did Rico? Try to actually give details and not sound like a moron just making sh!t up.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.