Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 4 weeks ago

Why are Trump supporters complaining that the ambassadors don't have first-hand knowledge of what Trump said when they prevent the ...?

witnesses who do from testifying?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 weeks ago

    Trump supporters are not in control of who the witnesses are.

    Even if they want a particular witness they need to get the approval of Shifty Schiff before he or she will be allowed to appear.

  • 4 weeks ago

    That is how the Mob works.  The bosses never give a direct order to any but a very small few, and those few are so deeply in the crap themselves that they won't flip, so it is, and has always been, hard to prove that the orders came from the big man at the head.  However, it defies credibility to pretend that such control freak leaders would ever allow anything to happen beneath them against their approval.  this is why RICO laws got put into place.

    So, sure, the very idea of the defense is to pretend there is not proof, only hearsay, but it requires total incompetence in the ruler, and a lack of rule over associates, in order to accept that the lack of proof is proof of lack.  When so many are following the same game plan, it is extremely unlikely that there is not someone at the center giving instructions. This is not chaos, it is just hidden organization.  They are very different things. There is nothing rogue about the unified behavior of so many people.

  • David
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    Trump supporters don't prevent anyone from testifying. 

  • 4 weeks ago

    0bumma's people that you are you are bringing in that actually heard the conversation are only able to testify that the transcripts are correct, and that in their opinion 0bumma would have done it different... This is why you sack these folks from the start. I believe the testimony will reveal that 0bumma would have held the money back until Ukraine promised to go all-in on abortions and gay-sex...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 4 weeks ago

    Well, it means that they don't know any more than you know, and you are not a reliable witness to what ever did happen. The question I would like to have answered are these the same diplomats that were there when Biden & Son made their Burisma deal, and what did they say at that time. Did they think it was corruption or OK?

    • Mr Pottimus
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      the rules have been made very clear, if you mention Biden you will be removed from chambers, by force.

  • 4 weeks ago

    Someone lied to you, you were gullible enough to believe the lie.

  • 4 weeks ago

    Republicans are trying to prevent the wistle blower from publicly testifying? This is news to me

    • wombatfreaks
      Lv 7
      4 weeks agoReport

      The whistleblowers so called "complaint" has been verified by those who listened to the call, but it is important to know the motivation of the whistleblower so he can be held acountable. 

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 weeks ago

    At least Sondland DID speak to the president.

  • 4 weeks ago

    In America, you have to do what my country did to North Korea, sever relations and problem solved.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.