Anonymous
Anonymous asked in SportsBaseball · 4 weeks ago

Is it amazing how the Nationals won it without superstars?

Everybody's talking about it too.

Beating the team filled with superstars even, just like a Disney movie.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Bob
    Lv 7
    3 weeks ago

    No, not really the SF Giants did not have any and they won 3 in 5 years.

  • TedEx
    Lv 7
    4 weeks ago

    That's what happens when there are no superstars but everyone has a good year. If any questions  google ""Philadelphia  Phillies"

  • 4 weeks ago

    They played well. They won five elimination games in which they trailed. They came back from down 3 games to 2 in the World Series. However, they do have superstars. Anthony Renton, Stephen Strasburg and Max Scherzer are superstars.

  • 4 weeks ago

    It just builds a further case against Scott Boras. Big $$$ contracts are not the same as celebrating with a victory parade at the end of October.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    4 weeks ago

    Yes it is, greatest team ever.

  • 4 weeks ago

    There aren't many true superstars in baseball these days so winning a championship without one isn't as unusual as you might think. 

    Mike Trout, Nolan Arenado, Jose Altuve, Clayton Kershaw, and Max Scherzer come to mind when discussing elite players but the rabbit balls used this season made good pitchers look bad and made weak hitters look like Hall of Famers.

  • Anonymous
    4 weeks ago

    Max Scherzer is a 3 time Cy Young Award winner. He is the definition of a superstar.

  • 4 weeks ago

    You know the Nats has a certain 3x Cy Young award winner in their rotation right?

  • 4 weeks ago

    Yes they are a good team.

  • Brian
    Lv 6
    4 weeks ago

    Yes, I'm sure that your trailer park is all abuzz.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.