Trump is complaining that the whistleblower is gone. What do they still need him for?
Someone calls 911 because they hear shots down the street at the bank. The cops show up at the bank, and, sure enough, it’s been robbed, and there are numerous witnesses there who saw the crime. The suspects confess. Normally, at this point, no one cares about who called 911.
- 3 weeks ago
The whistleblower should be thankful that Obama is not still the President. He would be locked up for spying if he was.Source(s): https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/03/flas... https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/10/n...
- Weasel McWeaselLv 73 weeks ago
Cons can't grasp the FACT that the Whistleblower LAW, ***specifically*** protects the identity of the Whistle blower to prevent REPRISALS----------like when Trump compared the whistleblower to a spy and suggested we should do to them what we do to spies.
So there stood the president of the United States, wishing he could KILL the Whistleblower.
The hell with the LAW, right?
but once again, this is FINE with cons............screw the Law, Praise Cheezus!
- Joe in texasLv 73 weeks ago
Yes but the “whistleblower” did not hear the shots fired.
He heard rumors that shots were fired.
He heard rumors of a conversation that we now have a transcript of.
Democrats started this investigation based on a rumor.
Ow we don’t need anyone,’s opinion.
Anyone able to read a English can see for themselves Trump did not threaten to withhold money.
- DesolateLv 63 weeks ago
I imagine it may have been more than one person, and he's already admitted his guilt, at any rate.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- marsel_duchampLv 73 weeks ago
Yes. As with anonymous tips the whistleblower is not needed at this point. The actions he reported are being found to be true. He was not a witness to those actions.
- 3 weeks ago
He is irrelevant except for being an asterisk in the story.