Why does Wikipedia not allow any association between the Richat Structure and Atlantis?

I have tried a few times to locate any information that link both the mythical (island) city of Atlantis to the Richat Structure. In both cases non were found on Wikipedia. Even though in recent times all kinds of proof came to light that the Richat Structure MIGHT have been the location of Atlantis. This one person on YouTube delved very deep into this matter and found indirect evidence that all hinted towards this possibility. But Wikipedia does not allow this, because, as they quote "it must be a proven fact". This contradicts for example the article about the existence of planet 9. So why is Wikipedia so reluctant to link these two? And what do you think?

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    3 months ago

    The sooner they ban you from Wikipedia, the better. Idiot.

  • 3 months ago

    It's the lack of "reliable" sources for the claim. Good luck convincing them a bunch of tabloids and a YouTube video fall in that category.

    In any case the Richat Structure is too small to be Atlantis, which is described in Plato's writings as "greater than both Libya and Asia combined". Sounds like substantially more than 25 miles across. That should close the book right there.

  • Me2
    Lv 7
    3 months ago

    The Richat Structure is on a plateau well iNland, and you say Atlantis was an iSland.  Surely you see the contradiction.

    • Snowwie8883 months agoReport

      Maybe the ocean levels were much higher 10,000 years ago?

  • 3 months ago

    Wikipedia is notorious for being liberal slanted.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.