Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 11 months ago

All men should be given vasectomies, and only when they earn over $60,000 a year, should they be allowed to have children.?

Update:

Raising children into poverty is a horrific crime, it should be a felony carrying long prison terms.

15 Answers

Relevance
  • 11 months ago

    What if they only make $59, 995 dollars?

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • LOL If women don't want babies from a man who earns less than $60,000 there is a cheep and effective tool to accomplish that goal and avoid being a parent. Just Say No! You do realize it's women who have biological clocks. It's women who want babies NOT men. In general, men would be relatively happy to avoid fatherhood. They just don't want someone rooting around inside their ball sacks to accomplish it. Should all women get a tubal ligation? Last I checked, it takes 2 people to make babies.

  • 11 months ago

    What are you, some sort of socialist?

    They shouldn't be GIVEN anything. They should PAY for the OPPORTUNITY to have children - and that payment should be $500k. In cash.

    • John
      Lv 4
      11 months agoReport

      Given what? He said they must EARN $60,000 a year.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    Scientists need to develop a virus that will selectively infect and sterilize the stupid.

    But that's eugenics. Eugenics is a no-no.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    11 months ago

    Who will pay for the vasectomies? They cost around $500,000 each.

    • John
      Lv 4
      11 months agoReport

      Where did you get that figure from?

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • John
    Lv 4
    11 months ago

    It's not just money. A person's emotional intelligence should also be tested. However, the real issue is how you would enforce this. Such a law would immediately be found to be unconstitutional.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    11 months ago

    Is this part of your plan to eradicate impoverished minorities?

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Dooby
    Lv 7
    11 months ago

    Sure why not... as long as this law is absolutely gender neutral in application.

    ... bet you don't support that.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    I basically did that anyway. I am gay and had to pay about $80k for my son Beckett by surrogacy.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    11 months ago

    All women should have atleast 6 miscarriages before being allowed to give birth.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.