Is it time to admit that guilty until proven innocent is the superior form of judicial system? We let rapists like Kavanaugh go free?
If you weren't guilty you wouldn't be on trial to begin with. We all know you're guilty as sin, but you manipulate the system to get off easy.
- car253Lv 79 months ago
You are innocent until proven guilty. Kavanaugh was never taken to court so he cannot be called a rapists.
I was maliciously prosecuted for a crime i did not commit. I went to a jury trial and was found not guilty. You think innocent people don't get prosecuted for crimes they did not commit? Well they do. I am one of them..
People lie. Innocent until proven guilty.
- out2lunch4now2Lv 79 months ago
OK, sparky, I accuse you of rape, murder and drug dealing. Report to prison tomorrow to face death in the gas chamber. I accused you therefor, you are guilty.
- MercuryLv 79 months ago
No it is not your post is nonsense.
- 9 months ago
You should be locked up because you are guilty of DISAVOWING THE CONSTITUTION and YOU DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE SYSTEM OF JUSTICE TO BE PROVEN GUILTY.. I THINK YOU ARE A CHILD MOLESTER... SO HENCE WITH YOUR THINKING YOU ARE GUILTY BECAUSE I SAID YOU DID IT and you have no right to a court or jury system to prove your innocent unless proven guilty just as YOU say Kavanaugh has no legal rights either. WE LET CHILD MOLESTER'S LIKE YOU GO FREE..
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous9 months ago
Brett Kavanaugh is not a rapist. Democrats want to smear him because he was appointed by Trump.
- 9 months ago
Those systems that put the burden of proof on the defense generally have a very extensive pretrial judicial investigation. It is expensive.
- The First DragonLv 79 months ago
I think you are a rapist; if you can't prove you're not, you should go to prison.
Even if nobody accused you of rape, I still know you have done it.
- Jim2Lv 79 months ago
No..... We had better hang on to the old way. I see what you are saying though. It's like Al Capone. Everyone knew he was guilty, but they couldn't pin anything on him until Elliot Ness finally pinned tax evasion (I think it was) on him.
But no, we cannot assume anyone is guilty until there is proof. Look at the trial of Jesus. They crucified him without proof! They were actually just jealous of him, and didn't like him telling the truth about them, or disappointed, or something. So even though we have our Al Capones, we still need PROOF.
- u_bin_calledLv 79 months ago
if by "time" you mean you've decided to move on and locate all the dead horse's next of kin and start beating them rather than talking substantively about jobs & the economy..... they by all means, make it so....
- ChrisLv 79 months ago
This is why I would never vote for a Democrat.