Trey asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 5 months ago

If it wasn't for all the people sending them money, wouldn't the starving children in Africa get a natural equilibrium with the environment?

They're only starving because we keep sending them more supplies than they can naturally produce.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 5 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Kennison said we should send moving vans instead of food.

    That's probably right.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Zirp
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    If it weren't for western banks and corporations exploiting african countries, we wouldn't "need" to send them money.

    Without imports, no major city could survive

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Sally
    Lv 7
    5 months ago

    Not to mention the massive droughts caused by global warming.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • John
    Lv 6
    5 months ago

    That would require a cultural change and a decrease in birthrate brought about by education. Sending less supplies won't reduce the number of kids born, just increase the number that die.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.