If it wasn't for all the people sending them money, wouldn't the starving children in Africa get a natural equilibrium with the environment?
They're only starving because we keep sending them more supplies than they can naturally produce.
- Godless GazooLv 75 months agoFavorite Answer
Kennison said we should send moving vans instead of food.
That's probably right.
- ZirpLv 75 months ago
If it weren't for western banks and corporations exploiting african countries, we wouldn't "need" to send them money.
Without imports, no major city could survive
- SallyLv 75 months ago
Not to mention the massive droughts caused by global warming.
- JohnLv 65 months ago
That would require a cultural change and a decrease in birthrate brought about by education. Sending less supplies won't reduce the number of kids born, just increase the number that die.