Trey asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 4 months ago

If it wasn't for all the people sending them money, wouldn't the starving children in Africa get a natural equilibrium with the environment?

They're only starving because we keep sending them more supplies than they can naturally produce.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 4 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Kennison said we should send moving vans instead of food.

    That's probably right.

  • Zirp
    Lv 7
    4 months ago

    If it weren't for western banks and corporations exploiting african countries, we wouldn't "need" to send them money.

    Without imports, no major city could survive

  • Sally
    Lv 7
    4 months ago

    Not to mention the massive droughts caused by global warming.

  • John
    Lv 6
    4 months ago

    That would require a cultural change and a decrease in birthrate brought about by education. Sending less supplies won't reduce the number of kids born, just increase the number that die.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.