Has King Gavin Newsom learned that he can not violate the U.S Constitution by deleting President Trump from the ballot?

Marxist Gavin Newsance, is now facing lawsuits for his arrogance and ignorance

Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, was just slapped with two lawsuits over a law he signed last week requiring candidates to release their tax returns in order to qualify for the state’s primary ballot, a nakedly partisan stunt that was specifically designed to target President Trump.

The core legal issue is simple and straightforward: The U.S. Constitution establishes the qualifications for someone to serve as President, and states don’t have the authority to supersede the Constitution by imposing their own requirements.

Better Wise Up Democrats - TRUMP 2020

Attachment image

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 year ago
    Favorite Answer

    Next thing you know, he'll be showing up at GOP conventions, telling the delegates what they can and can't do.

    On the bright side, maybe we'll finally get to see Nancy Pelosi's taxes, and discover how a life long public servant has somehow acquired $202 million in assets. Or at least this was according to her 2014 financial disclosure statement, but only gave a range, saying her assets were between 43.4 and 202 million. WTF? She doesn't know if she has "43.4 million" or "202 million"?! Wouldn't that be nice to not even know how many millions you had, so had to give a range span, with a 150+ million dollar spread.

    All I can say is, who the eff cares about Trump's taxes, his financial stuff has been plastered on the front cover of newspaper tabloids, and written about for decades, and we know where he got his fortune, and when he lost a ton.

    But with the Pelosi's, where on earth did they get all this money with her annual salary as Speaker of the House of $223,500 per year and even less when she was minority leader?

    UPDATE: The United States Constitution only requires three conditions to run for president: 1) Born in the US.; 2) Over the age of 35; & 3) Has lived in the US for past 14 years. AND states DO NOT have the right to add additional conditions to being able to be a candidate, it is expressly stated under article II section 1 of the US Constitution.

    If you don't believe me, read it. People never read anything these days...

    "The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.

    No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."

    The states do not control who can run for president. This was delineated in our Constitution. And the Founding Fathers never had a tax requirement. Heck, there were no taxes then, so why would they? Well, except for the oppressive taxes being taxed by King George, and caused a revolution... but you know, I am sure that Gavin Newsom and King George III would have a lot in common, but certainly not with our Founding Fathers, and what he did WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Gavin Newsom is the same genius who said "44% of all Americans are gay".

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    False premise.

    Thanks for playing – please insert coin and try again.

  • Edwena
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    They will have the Presidential election and exclude the California electoral votes. That will assure a Trump landslide. The electoral college serves the purpose of negating shenanigans.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    Great question and answer .. ****

  • Butt hurt libshits like Gavin can't help themselves. They see the field of idiots on the left challenging Trump and realize none of them have a snowball's chance. They resort to desperate measures, mostly to ease that butt hurt, letting they tell themselves they tried.

  • `
    Lv 6
    1 year ago

    Like Trump needs KKKalifornia, anyway.

  • 1 year ago

    You seem to be confused. No one is preventing Trump from running for office in California. No one is stopping people from voting for him. But you'll notice the Constitution does not say anything about how a state chooses to put the candidates on ballots nor does it say anything about a party system. And there are already lots of requirements for a person to appear on a state ballot and THOSE aren't Unconstitutional

    It is REALLY weird that Republicans are up in arms over this but have no problem with things like the electoral college, voter suppression, gerrymandering, etc.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    Democrats are such snivelling hateful turds.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    "states don’t have the authority to supersede the Constitution by imposing their own requirements."

    So states are not allowed to impose voter ID?

    EDIT:

    Jurisprudence concerning candidacy rights and the rights of citizens to create a political party are less clear than voting rights. Different courts have reached different conclusions regarding what sort of restrictions, often in terms of ballot access, public debate inclusion, filing fees, and residency requirements, may be imposed.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.