atheists can you debunk MR William Lane Craig conclusive argument against atheism?

As always, WLC shows that atheism is profoundly mistaken

for example, DR Craig expresses that atheism is against the second law of thermodinamics because IF THE UNIVERSE HAD BEEN ETERNAL THERE WOULD NOT BE USEFUL ENERGY RIGHT NOW

But there is still plenty useful energy, therefore the universe is not eternal and has been created

28 Answers

  • 1 year ago

    That's easy! Energy is not destroyed but one type can be absorbed by another and thereby a different or new energy can be made. Therefore, lying Craig is still lying.

  • Help me connect the dots from point A to point B.

    A is a universe that is not eternal.

    B is a universe created by god.

    How are you (andWLC) connecting A and B.

  • 1 year ago

    I always feel like theists don't understand the 2nd law of Thermodynamics. It basically says that in a "closed" system, potential energy will equalize losing it's ability to do work. This universe is apparently a "closed" system in that new energy is not being added and the universe is losing its potential to do work. Lookup "heatdeath" for our universe. We know the universe is not eternal, but the Cosmos (all that is) certainly is eternal because energy is eternal since it cannot be created, nor destroyed. Since energy cannot be created, it means it is "uncaused", as well as there can be no Creators since it cannot be created. If our universe was an "open" system, then that means outside energy is being added to maintain potential to do work. We have no idea if our universe will remain a closed system or if at some point it will open up for additional energy. You can look up why Craig's arguments fail.

  • Matt
    Lv 5
    1 year ago

    Created by big bang most likely. Energy comes from molecules and thier parts. And the universe will eventually end after every star dies out, gets absirbed into blackholes, become blaclholes themselves and even those willl vanish once theres nothing left to compensate for hawkings radiation.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Cowboy
    Lv 6
    1 year ago


    such a goofy thing to think - or NOT think as the case may be. Clearly Dr Craig is a fool....... so are you!!!

  • 1 year ago

    I prefer God's debunking of Atheism.

    Seems to me that has more authority and is far more conclusive.

  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    In physics and chemistry, the law of conservation of energy states that the totalenergy of an isolated system remains constant; it is said to be conserved over time. This law means that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; rather, it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another.

    MR William Lane Craig is stupid

  • 1 year ago

    The only conclusive argument to counter atheism is testable evidence for the existence of any of the many thousands of gods. Craig has not done that. He can waffle about the second law of thermodynamics to his heart's content (although he doesn't seem to know what it is) but that still does not provide any evidence for gods. He knows he cannot provide such evidence which is why he puts up a smokescreen of pseudo-science.

  • The atheists never had anything anyway, dear, just fallacies, intellectual dishonesty, and desperate and insecure whines and complains. Atheism, by many accounts, is very stupid, dear. I hope all atheists break free of the phase of atheism before it's too late!

  • 1 year ago

    Few, if any, atheists believe that the universe is eternal. Our universe, the one that we know, began 13.77 billion years ago with the big bang, and its amount of useful energy has been running down ever since in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. Nearly everybody knows this (although apparently not Mr. Craig).

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.