Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 6 months ago

If America had 11 million RUSSIAN ILLEGALS, would CONS still freak out?

Or would they be OK with it since they are not illegals from Latin America.

How would ICE deal with Eastern European illegals??

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    6 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    Cons see white people and automatically assume they are Americans.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • ricky
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    When you realize the truth is, it’s not about color, it’s about only allowing what our economy can handle, only then will you see that the racist comments you spew, or wrong. Oh yes, there are Racist Americans, from both sides. But as a conservative I judge people by their character as individuals. 11 million more than the one million we legally make citizens is too much. Doesn’t matter where from. But I Would prefer those that didn’t want to destroy our country attempting to make it like the $hithole they left.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • abdul
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    You libs are the real racists. You really believe the problem with 12 million illegals in the country is their point of origin. Actually, 12 million illegal Russians would be far worse, because we see Russia as an antagonist state

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 6 months ago

    Of Course, the incentives for illegal crossing in the southern border are mostly fraudulent in nature. Unaccompanied minors (teenagers: should be deported back to their parents or relatives in their country of origin immediately) will get welfare & housing with clubhouse amenities. Anchor babies will get welfare/housing assistance. Accompanied minors will get welfare as well.

    Illegals use false identities & fraudulent social security numbers. American citizens engaging in welfare fraud or any fraudulent schemes gets charge & imprisoned, but illegal aliens get sanctuary, especially the criminal element as they are not deported.

    Before Lyndon Johnson's Presidency vetted Legal Immigrants in less than half of todays numbers came for work opportunities, didn't receive social services & only real refugees were seeking asylum.

    Lyndon Johnson's great society programs initially was for U.S. citizens, as it expanded with various duplicate programs, illegal immigrants with minors & anchor babies are now being covered to overwhelm the school & welfare system.

    Do American's have the right to illegally immigrate anywhere in the world? Whether under socialist or capitalist system uninvited non citizen/non residence (invaders) don't have the legal right to illegally enter or trespass on communal residence/complex, private property or residence without permission.

    Illegally crossing or overstaying ones visa is not a right. Taking in refugees is out of generosity not a right. A Legal Immigrant should have more right for having permission or invitation. It's as simple as Guest vs Trespassers

    Funny how Cuba, Venezuela, N Korea, S. Korea, Japan, China, Canada, Australia, Saudi, UAE, most of Africa, at least most of non western countries don't have 15-20 Million Illegals problem. Could it be because Legal Immigration is Merit Based, laws against Illegal Immigration are highly enforced, at least 1 parent has to be a citizen or naturalized (after 10-15 years having proven allegiance & economic contribution to the sovereign) for birth-right citizen of a newborn, & limited, if not zero, social welfare advantages for illegal immigrants.

    Jordan only has real refugees because no opportunistic, parasitic, & criminal illegal immigrant would want to seek refuge in a country that doesn't provide employment opportunities, healthcare, permanent residency, birth-right citizenship, housing, & housing allowances for refugees & illegal immigrants, illegals will likely go to jail.

    Tent cities are all Jordan provides for refugee. Private charities, mostly foreign, provides the rest.

    Suspects gets detained for days unless they post bail, if they can't get they may get detained for month's until released without charges, unless convicted to be incarcerated for years. Illegals are suppose to get deported after claims for asylum is baseless & fraudulent.

    Homeless citizens don't even get proper care, & they deserve proper medical care more. Illegals didn't have medical care from any countries they crossed before illegally crossing into the US chasing after free ride entitlements that was meant for tax payers.

    DNA testing would determine if those illegal children are related to their alleged parents. Both the child & the adult should still be deported after processing determined that their relationship & their claims or flees for entry is fraudulent & denied. Children being trafficked should be sent back to their parents or immediate relatives in their country of origin.

    All Illegals crossing without legit documentation should all be chipped so that law enforcement can just scan them when they are caught violating laws, traffic violations, drug & human trafficking, invading & raiding private property & future illegal entry after deportation.

    The refugee act of 1980 is purely virtue signaling, it doesn't solve anything, but burden the country even further burden society, otherwise there wouldn't be a homeless problem. The Bill should be repeal or amended to a case by case basis. The 1980 refugee act made asylum automatic.

    In WWI, WWII, Korean War, (no great society duplicate programs to take advantage of) & Vietnam War, Refugees & Asylum were case by case basis. Not having a refugee act does not mean Real Refugees will not be granted Asylum. Other countries without a refugee act accepts refugees, but they cannot accept 10%-90% population of the refugees native countries as it will put tremendous pressure on the host countries land space, poverty, over crowding, food production, tax expenditures, cost of living, schools, health care, housing, waste & environmental pollutions.

    Sanctuary states in the west coast have created a Homeless epidemic due to all their virtue signal & having no solution, & they simply won't act & admit that they have an epidemic & need solution, but instead they add more virtue signaling because that is their only skill in life to get elected. The sanctuary law they created will have the same effect as the Homeless epidemic. Instead of solving the problem of Illegal Immigration, they perpetuate it, just like they perpetuated the Homeless & drug addiction problem. Burdening Sanctuary Cities with more Illegals they claim to care about will expose the money & corruption behind sustaining & perpetuating the Homeless & Illegal Immigration problem.

    (D)'s are using illegal immigrants as tools to gain more congressional seat in the same manner to how the slave state wanted full representation for the slave population for the slave states to have more power over the free states, but the (D)s today want power over free citizens as most of their supporters are addicted for handouts & highly dependent as they grow exponentially.

    (D) staffers are in Mexico coaching & abetting illegal immigrants to continue flooding the detention camps as they want the crisis to grow & pester this administration that is why they never did anything to prevent & discourage caravans after caravans from coming. They called it a Manufactured Crisis.

    Sanctuary states are transporting Illegal immigrants in their states to a non-sanctuary state's city like San Antonio, Texas. Ironically Sanctuary states don't want illegal immigrants transported in their cities. In the end the poor & smaller minority citizens are disenfranchised even more.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.