Anonymous
Anonymous asked in SportsWrestling · 1 year ago

Why was it ok for Becky Lynch to attack Baron Corbin, but not for Baron Corbin to attack Becky Lynch?

Becky Lynch was attacking him with kendo sticks, and did a dropkick on a chair from the turnbuckle on his face. But Baron Corbin did his finisher one time on her. And everyone's going crazy. Everyone's going mad. The announcers are like 'That's too far Corbin'. WTF. What is the meaning of this?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 year ago

    There is a double standard yes when a man hits a woman there is more outrage

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    apparently you are too stupid to understand it

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Because it is a dq to kick a man in the nuts, but not a dq to kick a woman in the vagina

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 year ago

    This is why there should never be inter gender matches. Something's always going to go wrong.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    ....Baron Corbin DID attack Becky Lynch though. He actually gave her the "End of Days".

    https://thebiglead.com/2019/07/14/brock-lesnar-bec...

    That's not the only time.....

    Randy Orton did an RKO to Nia Jax, in the MEN'S Royal Rumble, and he got away with it. It's just that it's more of a rarity in WWE(and even wrestling as a whole), that men are able to hit women and they aren't scrutinized for it, rather than the other way around.

    I don't like it, but it is true that(for the most part), women can hit men in WWE, and the men can't hit back.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.