In your opinion, what are the main points of this summary?

The goal of this paper is to widen the lens on language to include the manual modality. We look first at hearing children who are acquiring language from a spoken language model and find that even before they use speech to communicate, they use gesture. Moreover, those gestures precede, and predict, the acquisition of structures in speech. We look next at deaf children whose hearing losses prevent them from using the oral modality, and whose hearing parents have not presented them with a language model in the manual modality. These children fall back on the manual modality to communicate and use gestures, which take on many of the forms and functions of natural language. These homemade gesture systems constitute the first step in the emergence of manual sign systems that are shared within deaf communities and are full fledged languages. We end by widening the lens on sign language to include gesture and find that signers not only gesture, but they also use gesture in learning contexts just as speakers do. These findings suggest that what is key in gesture’s ability to predict learning is its ability to add a second representational format to communication, rather than a second modality. Gesture can thus be language, assuming linguistic forms and functions, when other vehicles are not available; but when speech or sign is possible, gesture works along with language, providing an additional representational format that can promote learning.

1 Answer

  • 7 months ago

    The main points are that both deaf and hearing children use gestures.

    And gesturing is distinctly different than sign language. But rather it's an integral part

    of learning to speak for both signers and non-deaf. So it's not really the same as

    a language in itself. It's more of a pre-cursor or tool to learn language, no matter

    whether the language is signing or speaking.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.