promotion image of download ymail app
Tim asked in SportsTennis · 11 months ago

Johanna Konta , British enough to represent Great Britain or is it more appropriate she represent Australia?

I mean if she believes she is more British , maybe it will help her visibility , she was born and raised in Australia until the age of 14 and probably feels a strong connection to both

3 Answers

  • David
    Lv 7
    11 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    If she wins, and especially majors, it won't matter what nationality she claims. If she can't win, it won't matter either. She needs to concentrate on winning. That will take care of any visibility.

    • Tim11 months agoReport

      I just think it’s interesting , she really has a claim to both but in tennis you have to pick one...

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 11 months ago

    Right now, she's playing as British. Many tennis players, and other competitors, play for a country that isn't their country of birth. Ruseski, born in Canada, played as British. If you like, Murray, born in Scotland, plays as British although only when he wins is he not 'Scottish' lol.

    • Verulam 1
      Lv 7
      11 months agoReport

      Sorry, should be Greg Rusedski

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    11 months ago

    How many athletes have changed who they compete for? Who cares.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.