How perfect was it that the dems first big witness was "not a fact witness"?

I mean, we have been saying for quite some time that the entire investigation was based on fiction. A "not a fact witness" seems to be the perfect witness for a trial based on fiction.

11 Answers

Relevance
  • Jeff D
    Lv 7
    7 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    And what did John Dean actually 'witness'? He hasn't been in the White House in over 45 years. His post-Watergate political career has consisted of comparing other Republican Presidents to Nixon (apparently, Democrats will pay for that).

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 7 months ago

    The big question has to be: why do they think Dean will be useful to Congress but they have not bothered to ask either Mueller or Weissmann?

    Is it better for their case to persist with the innuendo while ignoring any facts?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    7 months ago

    I think you misunderstand what "fact witness" means. It doesn't mean that Dean's information isn't factual. It means that he's not testifying to the facts of the crime in question. He's there to offer his expertise as someone well versed in presidential scandals. It's similar to bringing in someone who is an expert on tax evasion at a tax evasion trial. They can't speak about the specific facts in the case, but can provide background information.

    • I suggest that this should be based on facts and an expert in scandal should not really be relevant. In anything resembling a court this would not be allowed. This was a show for the faithful.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • John W
    Lv 7
    7 months ago

    At some point conservatives will stop plugging their fingers in their ears and saying "la-la-la" and listen to the truth about their corrupt and criminal president. Then hopefully they will do the right thing and call for his removal.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    7 months ago

    HE'S A WITCH !!!! GET HIM !!!!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 7 months ago

    It's peak irony.

    And these idiots think their "not a fact witness" is going to somehow sink Trump.

    😂 😘 👌 Lolz

    • Login to reply the answers
  • bil
    Lv 7
    7 months ago

    A convicted RINO is identical to a non convict Democrat. As no 'reasonable' prosecutor can convict a supervisor classless Democrat...Like Hillary or Teddy.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    7 months ago

    Which one of the cases, states or federal?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    7 months ago

    How perfect was it that the Dems first big witnesses are fascist Republicans in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Shilo
    Lv 7
    7 months ago

    It was perfect. The case is building to a crescendo. Stay tuned.

    • ...Show all comments
    • graphicconception
      Lv 7
      7 months agoReport

      The report says: "... the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." So I think that rules out collusion.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.