Do any scientists accept creation?
No relevant expertise? Here come the qualifications. I'm not talking about dentists and pharmacists. Microbiologists, biologists, physicists, geneticists, paleontologists. These are scientists. Or can we dismiss those too.
- Anonymous7 months agoFavorite Answer
^ Some theistic evolutionist believers and those that believed in God's account of creation
A small sampling from different fields:
Andrew A Snelling - Geologist
Georgia Purdom - molecular geneticist
Terry Mortenson - historian of geology
Tommy Mitchell - medical doctor
David Menton - Biologist, anatomist
Nathaniel T. Jeanson - research biologist
Danny R. Faulkner - astronomer
Neil Armitage - engineering
Eduardo Arroyo - forensics
Eugene C Ashby - chemistry
Thomas Barnes - physics
Timothy C Coppess - environmental science
David Down - anthropology
Alan Galbraith - Hydrology
Maciej Giertych - population geneticist
Steven Gollmer - atmospheric sciences
Robin Greer - biochemist
Edmond W Holroyd III - astrophysics, earth science
John Kruger - zoology
Myung Sang Kwon - immunology
Margaret Helder - Botanist
Neil Huber - physical anthropologist
David King - astronomy
Peter Line - neuroscience
Jason Lisle - astrophysicist
Alexander V Lalomov - geochemistry
Heinz Lycklama - nuclear physics
Lane P Lester - ecology
Ian Macreadie - molecular biology
Ralph Matthews - radiation chemistry
John McEwan - organic chemistry
Victor Meyer - entomology
Terry L Phipps - environmental biology
Craig Russell - soil science
Jon Sanford - plant science
Ron Samec - astronomy
Horace D Skipper - soil microbiology
- Anonymous7 months ago
- 7 months ago
The truth is there is a creator behind life. Whether the creator is an eternal universe out there in the multiverses, aliens, some kind of unknown material that can spontaneously cause things to pop into existence, or an intelligent creator /God who purposefully created life that has a mind etc. So the exact same reason why atheists would have for not believing in God ( which most would say is because they don't know enough about the origin of life yet and someday will find out eventually, can also agree their not knowing can also be a reason for why they shouldn't deny the possibility of a God)
- RicardoLv 77 months ago
None that can actually spell "scientist".
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- sk8terboy1963Lv 47 months ago
Only those with the god delusion.
- Anonymous7 months ago
Einstein and Newton both recognized intelligent design in nature and the ones who are smart will say they are agnostic if they doubt. My brother of same sign I am smart as Einstein and did not talk much until he was three and that is because I talked for him so much he did not have to talk too much when we were growing up together and deep thinker.
- Dan82828384Lv 57 months ago
Yes they do, there are Christian scientists that do and other scientists that do accept it. For sure look it up
- Huh?Lv 77 months ago
The title scientist is broad, any biologist will most likely not be a creationist. But a electrical engineer could be considered a scientist and with no formal training in the area of biology will claim to be a creationist.
That is a common deception used by creationists, they list "scientists" that have no relevant expertise and claim they reject evolution. They will even list a dentist, a chemist and a pharmacist and claim SEE SCIENTISTS REJECT EVOLUTION!
It is an appeal to authority falacy, appeals to those qualified in the field is not a fallacy but when a person points to someone totally unqualified and claim their status as "scientist" should make them an authority, they are being deceptive.
- LordJaggedLv 67 months ago
Very few, and they're not generally looked at very favorably by other scientists.
- LeoLv 77 months ago
Not if they're worthy of the name.