why should we define objects past mars as planets if they have no formal surface?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 year ago
    Favorite Answer

    Because having a solid, crustal surface is not one of the three criteria for an object being a planet.

  • 1 year ago

    They all have Solid Cores

    And they are bigger than us

    So I would keep that to yourself

  • Clive
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    Because what else do you call an object that is big, round and orbits a star?

  • 1 year ago

    Because there's a sense in which that's also true of Venus, and in other star systems of hot Jupiters.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Eric
    Lv 4
    1 year ago

    They just bestow names on things they claim exist billions of miles away. It's how they justify the billions of dollars they squander that would be better dedicated to schools and hospitals and communities and real science. Not pseudoscience.

  • 1 year ago

    They meet the definition of planets. A planet doesn't have to have a solid surface. If it orbits the sun, dominates the region of its orbit, and it big enough for gravity to make it round, it is a planet.

  • Nyx
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    Ahh, but they do have a "formal" surface.

    https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/system/downloadable_i...

  • 1 year ago

    According to the Ancients, planets are "wanderers". If they wander, then they're a planet. Sounds simple to me.

  • 1 year ago

    Because they DO hsve a surface underneath all that atmosphere is why.

    Planets chemically differentiate with iron and nickel forming the cores of ALL the planets. That is WHY they have global magnetic fields stronger than Earth's magnetic field..

    Source(s): B.S. geology, M.S. ABT geophysics, B.S. physical geography, M.S. geology
  • 1 year ago

    Because having a 'formal surface' isn't part of the 3 criteria that define a planet.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.