All induction is flawed, because its veracity is needed to verify it's own veracity.
For example, even if you put it as 'all external data have to pass through a mechanism to cause my internal experience, and the mechanism may give false data, therefore my internal experience of the external may be false' you will see that you cannot verify this mechanism without relying on it. The mechanism is some form of induction.
The impact on me would be that I won't answer the question about the impact, because it, too, relies on induction. However I'm contradicting myself, because the only way we can communicate is by assuming induction works, so I in the end, I ignore the fact that my induction may be flawed, and proceed as normal.
Therefore, I conclude that it has no impact on me whatsoever, how it affects 'the people' well idk.