Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 2 years ago

Why is the New World Translation a better Bible translation than the King James Version?

22 Answers

Relevance
  • TeeM
    Lv 7
    1 year ago
    Favorite Answer

    Please understand, If the only two choices I had to be able to read God's Word, was the KJV and the NIV.

    I would choose the KJV.

    Having said that, and I own 5 hard copies, (one given to me by my Grandmother) and several 'electronic copies'

    I know the KJV has some 20,000 errors in it.

    This is why the ASV, NASB, ESV, ISV and any number of the other translations you prefer were created.

    As one scholar stated, 'The majority of the reasons the NWT is different from other Bibles, is not because of their bias, but because of the accuracy of their translation' (loose quote)

    Why do people 'hate' the NWT? Because it doesn't agree with their preconceived idea of what the Bible 'should say'.

    People want the KJV to be accurate and if a translation doesn't 'agree' with the KJV this translation is deemed to be wrong.

    Ask yourself, how does a Bible scholar become acceptable and quoted?

    By agreeing with the KJV. If they don't they are slammed with accusations of being 'unlettered' 'unapproved'

    They could lose their jobs and positions at trinitarian colleges.

    Thus there is great pressure for such ones to support the renderings of the KJV.

    Thus there is great pressure for such ones to slam any Bible that doesn't agree with the KJV

    Or as one scholar stated:

    "We are the victims of 350 years of the King James tradition"

    .

    • Hoppy1 year agoReport

      Whereas IF they disagreed with the MIStranslation and JW interpretation Bible the NWT, they'd be shunned!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 year ago

    (ISAIAH 40:8 ) “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.”

    (Psalm 12:6-7) “The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” KJV

    The above are just a small sampling of God’s promises to preserve his word for ever.

    (Psalm 33:11) says God’s thoughts would NOT BE LOST but rather would stand to ALL generations, and we know from passages such as 1 Corinthians 2:12-13 that these divine thoughts have been expressed through divinely-chosen words. “Which things also we speak, NOT IN THE WORDS which man’s wisdom teacheth, BUT WHICH the Holy Ghost teacheth...” The promise in Psalm 33, therefore, is also a promise of the verbal preservation of Scripture.

    Notice (Psalm 12:67) states quite clearly that God will preserve his word for EVERY generation.

    Now compare God’s promises with some of the quotes made in the best answer awarded to a JW by a JW.

    “Why do people 'hate' the NWT? Because it doesn't agree with their preconceived idea of what the Bible 'should say'”.

    “People want the KJV to be accurate and if a translation doesn't 'agree' with the KJV this translation is deemed to be wrong”.

    “They could lose their jobs and positions at trinitarian colleges”.

    "We are the victims of 350 years of the King James tradition"

    This attack by the JWs on scholars throughout history, many who gave their lives so we that we could have access to the scriptures, Is Breath-taking in its arrogance. Especially when they both use and quote these same scholars for aid when it suits their purposes, simply Because the ‘watchtower organization’ doesn’t possess any scholarship of their own.

    The New Testament portion was released in 1950, as The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures, with the complete Bible released in 1961

    So, the JWs are calling God totally inept because He was unable to preserve His word for hundreds of generations as He promised, until they came along (With no recognized scholarship) to produce their own mis-translation in the 1950s.

    Ask yourself, who would you rather believe, God or the watchtower?

    • ...Show all comments
    • Rebmilc
      Lv 4
      1 year agoReport

      And by the way, I have 2,000 yrs of Church history and scholarship on my side. What do you have? 150 yrs and no scholarship. In an organization started by a man, who if he wasn't actually a freemason, certainly had freemasonry persuasions.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    There's a couple of reasons why the New World Translation is a better translation in the King James Bible the people that have written the New World Translation very frequently compare the New World Translation against the original Greek and Hebrew documentation trying to keep it as close to the original language as possible.

    The second reason is the King James has blatantly removed the tetragramaton the name of God from the Old Testament 5900 x in direct violation of Revelation that says you shall not remove things from the book!

    The New World Translation has done its utmost to put the name of God where God put it to start with. And if you're going to study the word of God study it with God's name where it's supposed to be! After all what good does it to study if you don't know what you're studying!

  • 1 year ago

    Greek text is best .

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 2 years ago

    The JW-made text, the New World Translation, is no bible. It's considered heresy by Christian churches.

    Source(s): Greek Orthodox Christian
    • ...Show all comments
    • Rebmilc
      Lv 4
      1 year agoReport

      Finally, as for “which churches consider the NWT heretical” consider the following:

      https://www.gotquestions.org/New-World-Translation.html

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 2 years ago

    It is NOT, as it has been changed. Some scripture is left out, others have been miss-translated.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • S
    Lv 4
    2 years ago

    The King James Bible is perfect, it is 100% accurate, and it is the Bible, and it is the fulfillment of the Lord's promise to preserve His Word.

    .

    The "new world translation" is from the "Jehovah's witness" cult that leads to hell, so avoid it and them.

    Jesus loves you and wants to bless your life freely :) Most of all, Jesus wants you with Him forever, and not in hell. The truth is that every belief except one will lead to eternal torment in the lake of fire for every person. Because nothing pays for our sins except the death and blood of Jesus, the sacrifice of Jesus that is already accomplished by Him . Jesus loves you! The truth is that Jesus is God, and Jesus died on the cross to pay for all of our sins in full, and then Jesus resurrected from the dead. Nothing else pays for our sins, not works, not deeds, not religions. So the only way to heaven and to avoid hell, is by believing in Jesus for eternal life (John 6:47), without adding any of your own works (Romans 4:5). Believe in Jesus to take you to heaven, and you will be in heaven, no matter what, guaranteed. That easy, thanks to Jesus! Tell Jesus that you thank Him that you will be with Him in heaven when you die, because you believe in Jesus! It is too late to be saved, after death

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Pearl
    Lv 7
    2 years ago

    nnaybe cause its easier to understand

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • it is not

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 2 years ago

    Just about all English translations are better than the KJV. The KJV writers had an agenda to support the King as head of the church in England and the Bible had to do that. As a consequence some phrases were translated less accurately than you would expect.

    On top of that English 400 years ago was different from today, words had different meanings and do not mean today what the translators intended. We do not find that surprising with the works of Shakespeare, Marlowe or Jonson, whose writings were contemporary with the KJV, so why do some people insist that a modern understanding of various words is what was meant at the time?

    The KJV has a place in history and is a lovely version of the Bible demonstrating the use of English 400 years ago but it is not a particularly useful translation for people who want to know what the Bible says. Modern translations are more accurate.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.