The word of ONE person (the victim), is enough to convict someone of a sex crime; is that right?

Nevermind the Kavanaugh story on tv.... in reality, in the courtroom, the word of ONE person can convict someone! No corroboration needed! Source: https://www.wksexcrimes.com/the-word-of-one-young-child-is-sufficient-to-have-an-adult-arrested-and-convicted-of-a-sex-crime-penal-code-section-288/ See, I... show more Nevermind the Kavanaugh story on tv....
in reality,
in the courtroom,
the word of ONE person can convict someone! No corroboration needed!


Source: https://www.wksexcrimes.com/the-word-of-...

See, I wasn't lying!

Wait, what happened to "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" ???

the word of ONE person (often a child/minor) is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" ????

No corroboration needed?


Does that seem consistent with our constitution's guarantee of due process?
How is that constitutional?


Granted ---- if that wasn't the case ----- no one would ever be convicted of sex crimes. because there usually aren't additional witnesses.
but ---- still --- one witness is enough?
seems like an awfully low bar for "proof beyond a reasonable doubt."

Your thoughts?
12 answers 12