It's an extremely unsatisfactory position, where Jackson is concerned!
He is neither innocent, neither guilty! But as a dead celebrity he is "safe", a marketers dream, since he now poses no threat whatsoever.
Either way it's extremely troubling!
Was he used?
Or were the children used?
Or does the truth lie midway.
Only the kids can answer that. Not their parents, or their lawyers for whom it was all about money.
It's disturbing when a boy on whose behalf the accusation is made, it's more of less time implied his own mother "pimped" him, because Jackson's wealth introduced her to a seductive lifestyle. Whilst she enjoyed the high life, as a consequence of her son's friendship, she seemed indifferent what her son was engaging in, willingly or otherwise. The boys father, however left out in the cold, saw a cushy chance of making money, hence the boys parents in this case, are inconsequential.
It's a pity its not about the truth, but money!
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/michael-jackson-child-sex-abuse-molestation-lawsuit-wade-robson-allegation-dismissed-a8120096.html "A judge on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit brought by a choreographer who alleged Michael Jackson molested him as a child, resolving one of the last major claims against the late singer’s holdings.
...............He did not rule on the credibility of Robson’s allegations themselves."
It's not "one accusation to completely ruin someone's career" the chances are there are many more who are unwilling to come forward, to subject themselves to the inevitable ensuing media circus.
Would YOU willing to let your children stay with anyone accused even by ONE accuser of such activities?
Should you call it wrong, it won't be you, suffering, but the kids.
Therein lies the dilemma.
· 12 months ago