A woman has a choice over her own body but why over her child's body, as many judiciaries in the world contend? Fetuses have beating ...?

Question

hearts, fully formed fingers and toes and even suck their thumbs at SIX WEEKS.

If a woman has control over her body, she should eliminate the chances of getting pregnant.

This is 2018, not 1955. There's a slew of options.

#NotHerBody

Answer 1

A child needs a new kidney and you are a match should we take your kidney without your consent? If fetus needs the use of a womb why should the woman be denied the chance to give or deny consent? Just as you have the right to refuse consent to give up a kidney she should not be forced to have her uterus used, her blood supply shared, her food that she eats used by another, and the use of her body to involuntarily sustain a fetus.

Answer 2

I wish my mom had aborted me unfortunately she was a loose pro lifer. Babies that are aborted are aborted for a good reason in every case! I guarantee it. If abortion is even a strong considered option for a mom and a dad then they should both agree to abort. It is a choice but the best choice is for a baby not to be born into a home where they are unwanted and unloved and not taken care of and raised by two people who are unfit parents.


You don't care about the unborn because if you cared about them you would want what is in their best interest and it is not in their best interest to be born to parents that are not prepared to at the very least give them up for adoption.

Answer 3

It's the law

Source(s):
....I am a retired police officer. I retired as a sergeant, after 29 years, from a very large department, about 12,000 officers. I was a patrol officer for 4 years in a very diverse area. I was a tactical officer in the high rise project areas of my city. We called it vertical patrol in that we walked the the stairways of the high rises most of the time. I did that for 5 years and was promoted by test to detective. I worked violent crime (homicide, sex, officer involved shootings, robbery, kidnapping, serious non property incidents) for 11 years until I was promoted to sergeant. I worked as a street supervisor, a bicycle patrol supervisor and a desk sergeant/watch commander.
During my time as a tactical officer and a detective I was a unit representative for the police union.
I have a B.A in English and an M.S. in Law Enforcement Administration....

Answer 4

Foetuses are like tumours and have too little awareness. If a pregnant woman decides to abort the lump of cells inside her womb, how will it affect your physical health, or financial life? Why care about things that doesn’t affect you in a negative way? This is usually the bad thing with older people, they care about things that got nothing to do with them. I know foetuses have the potential of becoming a human being, but still not valuable enough. I know it’s best to avoid getting pregnant in first place but banning abortions is just ridiculous.

Answer 5

Science says that life begins at conception, those that go by science know that abortion is killing human life.

Answer 6

Your attitude comes from 1955, not 2018.

Answer 7

Have you ever assisted at a dilation and curettage? Of course not. I have and have seen what the foetus looks like. It is not alive; it is not a viable life; it is a cyst that is growing inside the woman's body with all but one cell being provided by the mother.

No beating heart. The heart that does the beating is the mother's. The foetus at six weeks is nothing more than potential, like any other cyst. A whole bunch of pseudo science and religious quackery cannot change that.

Answer 8

If God didn't want the woman to have control He sure picked a stupid place to put the fetus.
Also babies are not aborted. That's not physically possible. Fetuses or embryos are aborted.

I respect your right to hold the opinion that women ought not choose to have an abortion. Good luck with that.

Where we have a problem is when you want to have GOVERNMENT and the POLICE AND COURTS enforcing your opinions. If your argument was persuasive you would not need BIG GOVERNMENT to back it up, would you?

Answer 9

You know who can also eliminate the chances? Men.

Either stop sleeping around or be more proactive/responsible. It isn't just her job to prevent it. But the fact that she's the one that ends up 'stuck' with the 'problem' if it happens.... then yeah, it's her body it's happening to and her decision.

It's funny that for all the anti-abortion men out there and those who cry about women supposedly "tricking" them or "trapping" men with a kid or child support... rarely do you hear of any advocating for the invention of a good male birth control pill. You would think the whole concept would be more popular if it gives guys more control over the situation and their own lives.

Answer 10

Religious parents are allowed to withhold life saving medical treatments from their children meaning that the parents always have control over their minor childrens' bodies