Rate these transfers out of ten if these players were to join these clubs next month and explain yourself as best you can, see below?

Question

Ozil - Manchester United
Sanchez - Manchester City
Butland - Liverpool
Barkley - Chelsea
Malcolm (of Bordeaux) - Tottenham
Mahrez - Arsenal

Ratings should be based on how much they'd improve the team really. Then just elaborate a little bit so we know why you chose your ratings

Answer 1

Ozil - United. 9/10. He would thrive there and United could really benefit it. Jose needs a very creative player like him. I hope it happens for the sake of Ozil

Sanchez - 3.5/10 maybe a few seasons
ago. Right now he’s not any better then the starting wingers right now in Sane and Sterling. They’re also way younger.

Butland - Liverpool 6/10 If Butland actually ends up showing he’s a top goalie this would be great for Liverpool. I just don’t really know what to rate him as a player.

Barkley - Chelsea 0/10. No he’s not good. He would not be helpful in any ways. He’s also always hurt. I don’t see what he could do better then Kante, Fabregas, Drinkwater, or Bakayoko.

Malcom - Tottenham. 5/10 I don’t even know who this guy is.

Mahrez - Arsenal. 4-/10. He’s been figured out. He’s just a decent winger now he’s not a player of the season caliber. Arsenal need to strength the defense and defensive midfield spot.

Answer 2

Ozil - Manchester United 1/10 Utd are crap full of midfield lazybones already.
Sanchez - Manchester City !/10 City have enough strikers
Butland - Liverpool - 1/10 Pool have a decent enough keeper - they need hardmen defenders.
Barkley - Chelsea - 1/10 Pointless exercise in futility.
Malcolm (of Bordeaux) - Tottenham 1/10 who he LOL
Mahrez - Arsenal 5/10 won't suit Gooner's style if Sanchez leaves.

Answer 3

Ozil 9/10 class is permanent

Sanchez 8/10 he's playing like crap on purpose

Butland 5/10 not buying it rather develop Karius

Barkley 3/10 conte has a wierd obsession with average CM's

Malcolm, lol Spurs and irrelevant players bc they have no pull power but I'm sure he's decent Pochettino isn't bad at spotting talent 5/10 gamble

Mahrez 8/10 class player but I think he's going to Roma if they come calling

Answer 4

Ozil-2/10, they already got enough flat track bullies in that team, if they ever wanna compete with city they gotta do MUCH better than that
Sanchez-1/10, not needed at all. We already got sane and sterling. It’s already hard enough to fit in Bernardo and Jesus in the team regularly as well, they’re both much better and younger than Sanchez so there’s no point in giving up a spot for him.
Butland-6/10, Liverpool need a solid keeper if they’re gonna have that sh*t defense lmao, butland is a good option but not THAT good
Barkley-0/10, he’s sh*t LOL
Malcolm-5/10 idk never heard of him, there’s a good chance that he could either turn out to be a quality signing like son or a complete flop like sissoko
Mahrez-3/10, don’t need him, wouldn’t make much of a difference

Answer 5

Ozil 8/10 Man United was improve greatly.
Sanchez 4/10 Man City a bad move for both.
Butland 6/10 Liverpool a good back up.
Barkley 7/10 Chelsea a good move for Barkley.
Malcolm 4/10 Tottenham this is unnecessary.
Mahrez 9/10 Arsenal would really improve their overall play.

Answer 6

Ozil - Manchester United 8/10 - God move for both parties, Man Utd need a creative mid, and Ozil needs a club without a giant loser mentality

Sanchez - Manchester City 4/10 - He's not needed at all, he's been doghsh1t in 2017 anyway, and he'd just be taking a place of a better player like silva, kdb, sane or sterling

Butland - Liverpool 5/10 - I don't actually think mignolet is that bad really, but I guess its a goodish transfer

Barkley - Chelsea 0/10 - Please sweet lord don't let this happen

Malcolm (of Bordeaux) - Tottenham - Malcolm could work well, in the middle particularly

Mahrez - Arsenal 3/10 - He's dropped off a lot since 2016, there's a lot of better players Arsenal could get, if any of them would be foolish enough to join

Answer 7

outnof luck