User
Lv 5
User asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 4 years ago

Did the terrorist attack by a black Muslim refugee with no gun anger the left?

It couldn't have been more against their ideology and agenda. Whereas they like to portray black people as victims, Muslims as peaceful, refugees as good people, and guns as the cause of violence, this was the exact opposite.

How can the left pretend this didn't happen? How will they spin the story?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Maybe if the main stream media would start reporting on black school shootings/attacks, maybe THEN some attention would be paid to the tidal wave of black violence.

    Oh, what do mean? BLACK school shootings? From 1997-2006, 54% of all school shooters were black.

    From backintyme:

    In fact, most school shooters (55 percent) are African Americans. Ever since the federal government made the nation’s schools death-traps in 1996 by outlawing armed self-defense by administrators, teachers, staff, or students, the rate of incidents has climbed to one school shooting every 60 days. From January 1, 1997 to September 16, 2009 there have been 50 school shootings involving 66 shooters. Of those 66 shooters, 36 were African-American, 19 were Euro-American, and 11 were other (Korean, Philippine, Indian, undetermined). Click on the links in the following table for pictures of the shooters. The fraction of African-American school shooters (53 percent) is higher than the African-American share of any other form of criminal violence.

    Here is a list of those 50 school shootings. Below the list are a small and incomplete subset where the shooters were black:

    Bethel Regional High School

    Pearl High School

    Heath High School

    Westside Middle School

    Parker Middle School

    Thurston High School

    Columbine High School

    Heritage High School

    Fort Gibson Middle School

    Buell Elementary School

    Lake Worth Middle School

    University of Arkansas

    Santana High School

    Granite Hills High School

    Martin Luther King, Jr. High School

    Appalachian School of Law

    John McDonogh High School

    Red Lion Area Junior High School

    Case Western Reserve University

    Rocori High School

    Columbia High School

    Fairleigh Dickinson University

    Red Lake Senior High School

    Campbell County High School

    Pine Middle School

    Essex Elementary School

    Orange High School

    Platte Canyon High School

    Weston High School

    Amish school

    Henry Foss High School

    University of Washington

    Virginia Tech

    Delaware State University

    SuccessTech Academy

    Louisiana Technical College

    Mitchell High School

    E.O. Green School

    Northern Illinois University

    Davidson High School

    Central High School

    Henry Ford High School

    University of Central Arkansas

    Dillard High School

    Henry Ford Community College

    Hampton University

    Larose-Cut Off Middle School

    Skyline College

    Deer Valley H.S.

    partial subset of the above where blacks were the school shooters

    Deer Valley H.S.

    Granite Hills High School

    Martin Luther King, Jr. High School

    Appalachian School of Law

    Delaware State University

    Essex Elementary School

    Louisiana Technical College

    Henry Ford High School

    Skyline College

    African-Americans Also “Shoot Up Schools”

    by Frank W Sweet, September 7, 2009

    According to President Obama’s (now resigned) “green policy” advisor Van Jones, “Only suburban white kids shoot-up schools.” See the video.

    Frank W. Sweet is the author of Legal History of the Color Line (ISBN 9780939479238), an analysis of the nearly 300 appealed cases that determined Americans’ “racial” identity over the centuries. It is the most thorough study of the legal history of this topic yet published. He was accepted to Ph.D. candidacy in history with a minor in molecular anthropology at the University of Florida in 2003 and has completed all but his dissertation defense. He earned an M.A. in History from American Military University in 2001. He is also the author of several state park historical booklets and published historical essays. He was a member of the editorial board of the magazine Interracial Voice, and is a regular lecturer and panelist at historical and genealogical conferences.

    ========================

    MYTH: Whites Are More Likely to be Pedophiles and Child Molesters

    BY ROBERT LINDSAY, MAY 5, 2010

    There is a long-standing myth perpetrated by blacks and white anti-racists like Tim Wise that whites are more likely to molest children than any other race. This goes back to some stereotype of the creepy, nerdy, weirdo white guy who can’t get laid so he molests kids.

    About time we shot this myth full of holes like it needs to be.

    Stats:

    % of total child molesters:

    White 51%

    African American 25%

    Hispanic 15%

    American Indian/Alaska Natives 2%

    Asian/Pacific Islanders 1%

    Relative to their population, likelihood of abuse compared to background population rate:

    American Indian +100%

    Blacks +92%

    Hispanics no difference

    Whites -35%

    Asian -67%

    On an individual basis, American Indians are most likely to molest a child, then blacks, then Hispanics, then whites, then Asians.

    The high Amerindian rate is probably due to the utterly collapsed nature of Amerindian families and societies as a whole. The high black rate is because, well, blacks have elevated rates of most crimes compared to whites, Hispanics, Asians and Amerindians. I fail to see why child molesting should be an exception. Low Asian rate is probably because across almost all crime stats, Asians typically have the lowest rates of them all.

    As you can see, not only are whites less likely to molest kids than blacks, they have one of the lowest child molesting rates of any ethnic group in the US, surpassed only by Asians.

    One rejoinder to this argument is that those statistics include as a “child” persons all the way to age 17. Sex with a 14-17 year old is hardly child molestation. The argument is that while blacks may be more likely to have sex with teens, whites are more likely to have sex with an actual child under the age of 13.

    * Those inmates who were convicted of committing violent acts against children were more like ly to have been white, a percentage of nearly 70%, than any other race.

    The figure is from the Bureau of Prisons, 1991. In 1991, whites were 74% of the population, and they were “nearly 70% of those convicted of child molesting.” In other words, whites are about 7% less likely to commit child molestation than an average American.

    The problem with the 1991 report was that, as usual, Hispanics were lumped in with whites in terms of crime perpetrators, artificially inflating the white rate. The 1994 Justice Department report finally disaggregates whites from Hispanics. The results, % of total child molesters by race:

    Whites 54.1%

    Hispanics 23.5%

    Blacks 20.7%

    Other 1.7%

    Now compare to their presence in the general population for likelihood of being a child molester as opposed to an average American:

    Hispanics +96%

    Blacks +59%

    Whites -35%

    Other -58%

    This lines up with anecdotal reports of high rates of sex crimes in areas overrun by aliens from Mesoamerica.

    The myth lies shattered.

    Blacks are 85% more likely to molest children than whites.

    Where did the myth come from? It’s not certain, but for most crimes, especially violent crimes, blacks have rates that are up to 6-9 times higher than whites. For child molestation, these wildly elevated rates for blacks are not seen. Instead, whites much more approach parity with black crime rates in terms of child molestation. This greatly increased white rate vis a vis blacks compared to other crimes may have given rise to the illusion that whites are more likely than blacks to commit this crime.

  • 4 years ago

    On behalf of liberals everywhere, I condemn the terrorist attack by the black Muslim refugee. If he had a gun, he might still be alive today!

  • 4 years ago

    I'm happy that nobody died in that incident and nobody died because the terrorist didn't have a gun, so gun control works.

    And African Americans had indeed being victims, study a bit of American History and you'll see it; We don't label all Muslims as peaceful but you shouldn't label all Muslims as terrorists.

  • 4 years ago

    Terrorist attacks are terrible, no matter the race or religion of the perpetrator.

    Were you angered by the plots of the Kansas Crusaders, who were arrested after planning to attack Muslim citizens? You should be. Race shouldn't be the determining factor of how you respond to terrorism

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 4 years ago

    So because one Somali refugee committed an atrocity, we should condemn all Muslims, refugees, and black people?

    Hm, what could possibly be wrong with that?

  • 4 years ago

    Yes. Terrorism and violence makes be angry. However, I can't help but notice the body count... especially when compared to the body counts of attacks pulled off by people with firearms.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    They were practically salivating at the possibility of an active shooter by a white person.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Some are already saying that the attacker is a victim.

    http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/28/us/ohio-state-attack...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.