Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Entertainment & MusicCelebrities · 5 years ago

Do you think it's right the actress Kelly Rutherford would have to send her children back to France?

Her children were born here in the USA, so why does she need to send them back to France where their father is?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    Because the courts decided he's a better custodian for the kids than she is.

    Which says something, because she's a very wealthy actress, who can afford top-level lawyers, which means the judge must have heard something really bad to give the Dad custody, because usually custody is a money-contest mostly.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 5 years ago

    Absolutely not, the kids should be with their mother, especially since they were born and raised in the US. Forcing them to live with their father, who was not their primary care giver and in another country is going to be destructive to them.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Moya
    Lv 7
    5 years ago

    NO

    they were birn in the USA

    They should stay in the USA

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.