☆ 軒 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 5 years ago

求救 期刊中文翻譯

Despite the considerable importance invested in the indi-vidual’s self-perceptions by most definitions of QoL, only 7 studies of the QoL of children with ADHD that included child ratings were identified. Two studies used the CHQ, both of which failed to find a difference between ADHD and controls. Landgraf and Abetz [41] found that children with ADHD (9–16 years) reported their QoL to be very similar to that of healthy controls across the nine domains of the self-report version of the CHQ-CF87. Klassen et al. [39] also found that children and adolescents with ADHD (10–17 years old) rated their own QoL as no different from the general child population across most of the CHQ-CF87 domains. Compared to a healthy control group they con- sidered themselves to be equal with respect to overall QoL, and on the role/ social functioning, general health percep- tions, bodily pain/discomfort, mental health, self-esteem and parental impact, slightly worse for physical function and behaviour and significantly worse only for family activities. The Klassen et al. study also compared child and parent CHQ ratings. Children rated their QoL significantly more positively than did their parents for their behaviour, self-esteem, mental health and family cohesion and sig- nificantly poorer for physical function. In general there was greater agreement between children and their parents for the physical subscales (with correlations between r = 0.75 and r = 0.60) than for the psychosocial subscales (between r = 0.40 and r = 0.48). Using the KINDL [62], Hampel and Desman [33] also found all domains of quality of life to be impaired in children and adolescents with ADHD compared to normative data.

Update:

QOL ----- quality of life

ADHD ----- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Update 2:

我要google 翻譯 我自行複製貼上就好了 ............ 暈

1 Answer

Rating
  • 5 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    儘管投資於INDI-維杜阿爾的自我認知通過生活質量的最科幻德的nitions相當的重要性,只有7個研究多動症的孩子,包括兒童收視的生活質量被鑑定。兩項研究中使用的CHQ,這兩者都未能科幻十二次多動症和對照組之間的差異。蘭德格拉夫和Abetz [41]研究發現,患有多動症的兒童(9-16歲)報告了他們的生活質量是非常相似跨越的CHQ - CF87的自我報告版本的九個領域健康對照者。克拉森等。 [39]也發現,兒童和青少年多動症(10-17歲)額定自己的生活質量,因為沒有來自全國各地大部分的CHQ-CF87域一般兒童人口不同。相比健康對照組,他們CON-sidered自己等於相對於整體的生活質量,以及角色/社交功能,一般健康知覺系統蒸發散,身體疼痛/不適,心理健康,自尊和父母的影響,稍更糟糕的身體機能和行為顯著惡化只為家庭活動。的克拉森等人研究還比較了兒童和家長CHQ評級。兒童認為他們的生活質量顯著更積極的比他們的父母為自己的行為,自尊,心理健康和家庭凝聚力和顯妮著地較差的身體機能。在總體上有兒童和他們的父母為物理分量之間更大的合作安排(R = 0.75和R = 0.60之間的相關性)比對心理量表(R =之間0.40,R = 0.48)。使用Kindl酒店[62],Hampel的和Desman [33]還發現生活質量的各個領域,以兒童和青少年受到損害多動症比較規範的數據。

    Source(s): Google翻譯
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.